Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,120,390
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Deletion of Entire Bogus Purchase Addition Upheld Where Sales Accepted and Books Not Rejected: ITO, Ward-1(2), Siliguri vs. Binoy Agarwal (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 889
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Binoy Agarwal, is engaged in the business of trading in furnishing items and filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2021-22 on 01.03.2022 declaring total income of ₹1,33,64,769....

Revision under Section 263 Quashed for Absence of Error and Prejudice to Revenue: Vikash Kumar Bohra vs. Principal CIT, Asansol (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 554
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 and the assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax invoked revisionary jurisdiction...

Assessment Quashed for Exceeding Scope of Limited Scrutiny and Violation of CBDT Instruction No. 5/2016: Subodh Adhikary vs. ITO, Ward-51(1), Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 773
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 11.01.2016 declaring total income of ₹5,86,810. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS for limited scrutiny specifically...

Assessment Quashed for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction: Notice under Section 143(2) Issued by Non-Jurisdictional ITO in Violation of CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 – Rajroop Doshi vs. ITO, Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 616
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed a revised return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 on 27.03.2018 declaring total income of ₹47,89,100. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS for examination of capit...

Reassessment Notice under Section 148 Quashed as Time-Barred under Rajeev Bansal Ruling: Sunblaze Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 719
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17. The Assessing Officer issued notice under Section 148 on 29.06.2021 under the erstwhile reassessment regime. Pursuant to the Supreme...

Section 68 Addition on Share Capital Remanded Where CIT(A) Exceeded Jurisdiction by Issuing Set-Aside Directions: ITO vs. Favourite Cloth Merchants Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 533
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 declaring total income of ₹480. The return was processed under Section 143(1) and later selected for scrutiny under CASS. N...

Artificial Intelligence in Professional Practice: From Efficiency to Precision

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 637
Read More »
 Artificial Intelligence in Professional Practice: From Efficiency to Precision (For Chartered Accountants, Cost & Management Accountants, Company Secretaries, Advocates, Accountants & Allied Profess...

ITAT Delhi in Goswami Bhagwan Lal Education Society v ITO (ITA No. 2238/Del/2025, order dated 27.11.2025) holds that non-filing of Form 10B is a curable defect; denial of section 11 exemption and taxation of gross receipts under section 143(1) is impermissible.

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 791
Read More »
ITAT Delhi-Goswami Bhagwan Lal Education Society v. Income Tax Officer Exemption Ward FaridabadITA No. 2238/Del/2025 | Order dated: 27 November 2025Coram: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad (JM) & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mish...

Taxability of Consultancy Income under India–UAE DTAA vis-à-vis Significant Economic Presence (SEP), Article 14, India–UAE DTAA vs Section 9(1)(i): Vijay Mariappan Austin Prakash v ACIT (ITA No. 89/VIZ/2025)

Author
CA. Ajay Kumar agarwal
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1276
Read More »
Taxability of Consultancy Income under India–UAE DTAA vis-à-vis Significant Economic Presence (SEP) Vijay Mariappan Austin Prakash v. ACIT International Taxation Income Tax Office Visakhapatnam ITAT Visakh...

Delhi High Court on Refund of Tax Recovered Despite Stay – Section 220(6), Shree Krishna Steel Traders v Union of India (W.P.(C) 8187/2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 567
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Shree Krishna Steel Traders, challenged the recovery of income-tax demand during the pendency of its statutory appeal for Assessment Year 2021–22. The Assessing Officer had passe...