Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
C. Manogaran vs. The Commissioner/Additional Chief Secretary, Commercial Tax Department & Another – Madras High Court Directs GST Authority to Consider Objections on GST Demand for Seigniorage Charges in Mining Lease; Status Quo Ordered – Sections 7, 9(3) & 63 of the GST Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, C. Manogaran, was declared the successful
bidder in a tender floated by the District Collector under the Tamil Nadu Minor
Mineral Concession Rules for obtaining a mining lease to conduc...
Pedda Kapu Narsi Reddy & Others vs. The Land Acquisition Officer, PJP Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District – Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation for Guava Trees While Upholding Land Value under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Section 54 Appeal)
Facts of the CaseThe appellants, who were landowners, challenged the judgment
of the Reference Court relating to compensation awarded for their acquired
lands and standing guava trees. Their agricultural lands situated...
M/s. Jhajjz Pvt. Ltd. & Others vs State (NCT of Delhi) & Others – Delhi High Court Quashes FIR under Sections 406 & 120B IPC Holding Commercial Contractual Dispute Cannot Be Converted into Criminal Proceedings through Forum Shopping
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners approached the Delhi High Court
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 196/2021
regis...
Shiba Prasada Rath vs State of Odisha & Others – Orissa High Court Directs Authority to Decide Contractor’s Representation for Release of Admitted Final Bill Including GST Within Three Months
Facts of the
CaseThe Petitioner filed a writ petition before the
Orissa High Court seeking a direction to the concerned government authority to
release the admitted final bill amounting to ₹4,78,139/- including GST
...
Muhammed Haris Rafeek & Anr. vs State of Kerala & Ors. – Kerala High Court Quashes GST Detention Order Passed Without Granting Opportunity of Hearing under Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners approached the Kerala High Court
challenging the validity of a final order passed by the State Tax Authorities
under Section 129(3) of the CGST/SGST Acts.The petitioners contended that ...
Dheeraj Kumar & 4 Others vs State of Uttar Pradesh – Allahabad High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Copyright Infringement Case Involving Alleged Sale of Pirated Spark Plugs under Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act and Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Facts of the CaseThe applicants filed an anticipatory bail
application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Case Crime No. 16 of
2020 registered under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act at Police Station
...
Hariom Gupta & Another vs State of Uttar Pradesh – Anticipatory Bail Granted in Copyright Infringement Case Involving Alleged Sale of Pirated Spark Plugs | Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957 | Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Facts of the
CaseThe applicants, Hariom Gupta and Ramkumar
Sharma, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Case Crime
No. 16 of 202...
Jigneshbhai Vasantlal Shah through Pritiben Jigneshbhai Shah vs District Magistrate, Surat – Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supply of Essential Commodities Act for Non-Supply of Legible Documents and Non-Consideration of Representation | Articles 21 & 22 of the Constitution of India, Section 3 of the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supply of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, Sections 3 & 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners challenged the preventive detention
orders dated 26.04.2022 issued by the District Magistrate, Surat under
the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supply of Essential
Comm...
M/s. R.P.M. Associates vs Goods and Services Tax Network & Others – Jharkhand High Court Allows Filing of GST TRAN-1 in View of Supreme Court Directions in Filco Trade Centre Case | Transitional Input Tax Credit | Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. R.P.M. Associates,
approached the Jharkhand High Court seeking a direction to the GST authorities
to permit filing of Form GST TRAN-1 for carrying forward eligible
transitional in...
M/s. R.P.M. Pharma vs Goods and Services Tax Network & Others – Jharkhand High Court Allows Filing of GST TRAN-1 for Transitional Input Tax Credit (ITC) in Light of Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. | Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. R.P.M. Pharma,
approached the Jharkhand High Court seeking a direction to the GST authorities
to permit filing of Form GST TRAN-1 for carrying forward transitional
input tax credi...