Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Shantanu Agarwal vs State of Uttarakhand & Others: Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Interim Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC; Family Court's Assessment of Husband's Financial Capacity Sustained
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-wife instituted proceedings under Section
125 CrPC seeking maintenance for herself and her minor son on the ground
that after marriage she was subjected to cruelty and harassment on acco...
Joseph M. George vs State of Kerala & Thomas Maani Kalappurayil – Kerala High Court Declines to Quash Criminal Proceedings under Sections 406 & 420 IPC, Holds Disputed Questions Regarding Dishonest Intention Must Be Decided During Trial
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Joseph M. George, approached the Kerala High
Court seeking quashing of criminal proceedings pending against him in C.C.
No.178/2019 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Tal...
Syed Rasheed vs State of Telangana & Others – Telangana High Court Directs Authorities Not to Interfere with Licensed Tobacco Business During Operation of Supreme Court Stay on Tobacco Ban Notification | Article 226 of the Constitution of India | Notification No. 501/FSS-1/2022 dated 07.01.2022
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Syed Rasheed, was engaged in the lawful
business of tobacco products under a valid licence and GST registration, while
regularly paying applicable taxes. Despite the petitioner carrying...
M/s Rajat Enterprise vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL): Rajasthan High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Sections 10 & 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Partial Settlement Due to Surviving Interest Dispute
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Rajat Enterprise, filed an
arbitration application seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Sections
10 and 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose
be...
Smt. Adwitiya Chakrabarti vs Union of India & Others – Tripura High Court Holds Courts Cannot Direct Legislative Amendments for Regulation of Exotic Animals under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Customs Act, 1962
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a law graduate, filed a Public Interest
Litigation (PIL) before the Tripura High Court seeking directions against the
Union of India and other authorities regarding the possession and r...
M/s JCC Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors.: Rajasthan High Court Holds Arbitration Not Maintainable After No Claim Certificate and Delay in Raising Dispute – Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Facts of the CaseThe applicants, M/s JCC Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. and its
authorised signatory, were awarded a Railway contract for construction of minor
bridges and allied works in connection with the Guriya–Marwar J...
Shaik Rafeeq Ahmed vs State of Telangana & Others – Telangana High Court Directs Police Not to Interfere in Lawful Tobacco Business During Supreme Court Stay | Article 226 of Constitution of India | COTPA, GST & Tobacco Notification Case
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Shaik Rafeeq Ahmed, proprietor of Royal
Traders, was engaged in the lawful business of tobacco products under a
valid GST registration, valid waybills, necessary licences, and payment o...
Pooja Dehy Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India – Gujarat High Court Directs Processing of GST Refund Claim by Treating Application as Filed Within Limitation Under Section 54 of the CGST Act Read with Notification No. 13/2022-Central Tax and Grants Statutory Interest
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners filed refund applications under Section 54
of the CGST Act, 2017 seeking refund of CGST. However, the Assistant
Commissioner rejected the refund claims on the ground that the applicatio...
Ghodawat Packers LLP vs Union of India – Karnataka High Court Upholds Levy of Central Excise Duty and National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) on Tobacco Products under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 and Section 174 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, who were manufacturers and traders of tobacco
and tobacco products, challenged the constitutional validity of Notification
No. 3/2019 dated 06.07.2019, by which Central Excise Duty at ...
Rajesh Kumar Dudani vs State of Uttarakhand & Another – Uttarakhand High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in Alleged Fake GST Invoice & Fraudulent ITC Availment Case under Sections 69, 70 & 132 of the CGST/UKGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe applicant, Rajesh Kumar Dudani, was carrying on
business through Suryanchal Furnitech and M/s Doon Trading Company.
He was summoned by the GST authorities under Section 70 of the Central Goods
and...