Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
M/s Sai Sujatha Engineering Works vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Ibrahimpatnam Circle & Anr. – Andhra Pradesh High Court | Assessment Order Without DIN Quashed | Sections 169, 73, GST Act, 2017 | Principles of Natural Justice
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Sai Sujatha Engineering Works,
challenged the Assessment Order issued in FORM GST DRC-07 dated 17.08.2024
for the tax period 2019-20, along with the consequential demand notice
dat...
M/s Sri Krishna Agencies vs Deputy Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order for Absence of DIN; Reassessment Directed Subject to 20% Deposit | Section 73 & Section 169 of CGST/APGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Sri Krishna Agencies, challenged
the assessment order dated 30.04.2024, the appellate endorsement dated 22.07.2025,
the summary in Form GST DRC-07, and the show cause notice issued ...
Sai Sujatha Engineering Works vs. Assistant Commissioner, Ibrahimpatnam Circle & State of Andhra Pradesh – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order Issued Without DIN; Remands Matter Subject to 20% Deposit under Section 169 of the CGST/APGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sai Sujatha Engineering Works,
challenged the GST Assessment Order issued in Form GST DRC-07 dated
17.08.2024 for the tax period 2020-21, along with the consequential
Demand Notice dat...
Meganatha Naidu Vadlamudi vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax & Others: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Composite GST Assessment Order Covering Multiple Financial Years – Sections 73 & 74 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mr. Meganatha Naidu Vadlamudi, a
registered taxpayer under the GST law, challenged Order-in-Original No.
08/2025-GST-Adjn (AC) dated 03.12.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner
of ...
Toshikaa Rejora & Others vs State (NCT of Delhi) & Another | Saurabh Chadha vs State (NCT of Delhi) & Another – Delhi High Court Quashes Cross FIRs After Mediation Settlement Between Former Partners | Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 120B, 379 & 380 IPC
Facts of the CaseThe petitions were filed before the Delhi High Court seeking
quashing of two cross FIRs arising out of disputes between the erstwhile
partners of M/s Likes, a partnership firm operating a salon busines...
The State of Telangana, Land Acquisition Officer (RDO), Narsampet vs Gundam Ranga Rao & Others – Telangana High Court Upholds Compensation at ₹375 per Sq. Yard for Land Acquired for Cattle Market; Sections 4(1), 6, 18 & 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Facts of the CaseThe Government acquired wet agricultural land measuring Ac.4.25
guntas situated in Survey Nos. 55, 56 and 776 at Narsampet Village and
Mandal, Warangal District, for establishing a cattle market. The
...
M/s [Petitioner] vs Union of India & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Allows Fresh Filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2 for Transitional Input Tax Credit under Section 140(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 Following Supreme Court Directions
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed the present writ petition under Article
226 of the Constitution seeking reopening of the GST common portal to enable
filing of Form TRAN-1 for claiming transitional input tax credi...
Hitender vs State of Haryana – Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail in Fake GST Invoice Case under Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 and Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 201 IPC
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Hitender, filed a petition before the
Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking regular bail in connection with
FIR No. 245 dated 24.05.2022 registered at Police Station City Bahadurgarh,...
Atul Kumar vs State of Uttar Pradesh – Allahabad High Court Grants Bail under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 after Bail in All Predicate Offences
Facts of the CaseThe applicant, Atul Kumar, filed a bail application
before the Allahabad High Court in connection with Case Crime No. 574 of
2009, GST No. 129 of 2010, registered under Section 2/3 of the U.P.
Gangste...
Sudershan Lal Gupta Contractor & Connected Petitioners vs Union of India & Others – Rajasthan High Court Upholds GST on Mining Royalty; Challenge to Levy Rejected Following Earlier Binding Precedents | Sections 9, 15, 50, 73 & 74 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseSeveral writ petitions were filed before the Rajasthan High
Court by mining contractors, mining lease holders, mineral associations and
other mining entities challenging the levy of GST on mining royal...