GST Adjudication Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Reply and Denial of Cross-Examination in Fraud Proceedings under Section 74 – Ambika Traders vs. Additional Commissioner DGGSTI (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 217
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Ambika Traders, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Gaurav Gupta engaged in the business of metal scrap, was registered under GST after migration from the VAT regime. A search was conducted b...

Reopening Quashed for Change of Opinion; Survey-Based Comparison with Subsequent Year Data Invalid – Matrix Clothing Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 118
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Matrix Clothing Private Limited, filed two writ petitions challenging notices dated 31.03.2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2015-16 an...

Excess Cash Deposits Held Unexplained; No Substantial Question of Law under Section 260A – Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO Ward 14(3) (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging a common order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had ...

Concurrent Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional AO and Faceless AO Reaffirmed; Reassessment Notices Upheld Despite Section 151A Challenge – Inder Dev Gupta vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 130
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed by Inder Dev Gupta and connected petitioners challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer of Central Ci...

Seized Jewellery, Bullion and Cash Directed to Be Released on Deposit of Advance Tax; Search Proceedings Pending under Section 158BC – Ananya Vir vs. ACIT Central Circle-27 (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions, including that of the petitioner Ananya Vir, was filed before the Delhi High Court by members of the same family challenging continued retention of gold jewellery, bullion, ...

Reassessment Quashed as Time-Barred Where Notice Dispatched After Limitation Despite ITBA Generation Before Cut-Off – Grid Solutions SAS vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 171
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Grid Solutions SAS, filed a writ petition challenging the notice dated 30.03.2025 issued under Section 148A(1) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2019–20, the order dated 30.06...

Receipts from Off-the-Shelf Software, Bandwidth and IT Support Services Not Taxable as Royalty or FTS under India–Singapore DTAA; Revenue Appeals Dismissed – CIT (International Taxation) vs. DXC Technology Services Singapore (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 108
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging a common order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014...

Reassessment for AY 2015–16 Quashed as Time-Barred; TOLA Inapplicable Post Rajeev Bansal – Anju Khosla vs. ITO Ward 15(1) (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Anju Khosla, challenged a notice dated 26.08.2024 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2015–16, the order dated 31.08.2024 passed under Section 148A(...

Reassessment Upheld Where No Change of Reasons and Section 148A Procedure Properly Followed Post-2022 Amendment – Amandeep Singh (Guru Kripa Enterprises) vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 111
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Amandeep Singh, proprietor of Guru Kripa Enterprises, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2021–22 on 14.03.2022 declaring income of ₹8,53,950. On 29.03.2025, the Revenue ...

Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Upheld Despite Faceless Scheme; Reassessment Notices Sustained in Delhi – All India Kataria Educational Society vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions, including those filed by All India Kataria Educational Society and connected assessees, were filed before the Delhi High Court challenging notices issued under Section 148 of...