Reassessment Quashed for Borrowed Satisfaction and Addition under Section 56(2)(x) Deleted on Merits: Naveen Singh vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Jamshedpur (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 165
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Naveen Singh, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring total income of ₹43,99,340, which was processed under Section 143(1). Subsequently, the Assessing Officer...

Delay Condoned and Ex Parte Appellate Order Set Aside in the Interest of Substantial Justice: M/s R.P. Singh & Co. vs. DCIT/ACIT, Circle-1, Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 142
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s R.P. Singh & Company, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi dated 20.07.2023 for Assessment Year 2016-17. The appeal before t...

Assessment Proceedings Set Aside for Failure to Bring Legal Representative on Record After Death of Assessee: Late Sabita Prasad vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 218
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals were filed by the husband and legal heir of Late Sabita Prasad for Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 against orders passed by the appellate authorities. The assessment orders for both ...

Assessment Restored for Fresh Adjudication Due to Non-Cooperation by Assessee with Exemplary Costs: Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. vs. DCIT/ACIT, Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 195
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi for Assessment Year 2018-19. Duri...

Reassessment Quashed for Parallel Proceedings and Absence of Mandatory Notice under Section 143(2): ITO, Ranchi vs. Amba Carbonisation Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ranchi)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 196
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Amba Carbonisation Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of smokeless coal and coke. For Assessment Year 2013-14, the original assessment under Section 143(3...

Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous After Assessment Set Aside under Section 263: Daltonganj Catholic Diocese vs. ITO (Exemptions), Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 213
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Daltonganj Catholic Diocese, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2016-17. The appeal arose out of an ...

Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Failure to Disclose Material Facts; Reassessment Quashed for Jurisdictional Defect: ITAT Ranchi in Bishnu Transport Company vs. DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 210
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by Bishnu Transport Company against the reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 147 read with Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Ye...

Penny Stock LTCG Cannot Be Treated as Bogus on Suspicion When Documentary Evidence Is Unrebutted: Bijoy Kumar Agarwal vs ACIT (ITAT Ranchi)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 250
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2011–12 declaring total income of ₹5,56,050 from salary and house property and declaring Long-Term Capital Gain of ₹30,55,833 as exempt...

Contractual Expenses Allowed and Revenue Appeals Dismissed in PSU Case Despite Search on Contractor Group: ACIT vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (ITAT Ranchi)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 213
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals arose out of cross appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee, M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (a Government of India PSU), along with cross objections, against orders passed by the CIT(A),...

Ex Parte Reassessment and Appellate Dismissal Set Aside; Matter Restored for Adjudication on Merits in Capital Gains Case – Jagdish Kumar Mahto vs. DCIT/ACIT, Circle-1, Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
23/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 188
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Jagdish Kumar Mahto, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2016–17 declaring total income of ₹10,06,440. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer ...