Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Assessee vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Appeal Against ITAT’s Rejection of Additional Grounds Held Premature Under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging the order dated 29.08.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The Tribunal had rejected the assessee’s application...

Saga Departmental Stores Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) | Disallowance of Commission Expenses for Lack of Evidence and Verification under the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 56
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was engaged in the business of operating departmental stores selling handicrafts, carpets and other items primarily to tourists.For Assessment Year 2005-06, the assessee claimed commissio...

The Motor & General Finance Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-VI, New Delhi – Whether Interest on Interest is Payable on Income Tax Refunds under Sections 143(1)(a), 154, 240, 243 & 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals were filed by various assessees including The Motor & General Finance Ltd., MGF India Ltd., Goodwill (India) Ltd., and MGM (India) Ltd. before the Delhi High Court. The common issue in...

Sonia Magu & Ors. vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | Section 132 Search & Seizure – Addition on Account of Alleged Unexplained Jewellery Deleted

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
 Facts of the Case A search and seizure operation under Section 132 was conducted on 17 January 2002. Jewellery belonging to various members of the Magu family was found during the search. The Ass...

Sonia Magu & Others vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) | Addition on Account of Unexplained Jewellery Cannot Survive Once Source is Fully Explained | Sections 132 & 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act was conducted on 17.01.2002 at the premises of M/s Indiair Carriers Pvt. Ltd. and the residential premises of members of the Magu ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Whirlpool of India Pvt. Ltd. (2009:DHC:7187-DB): Delhi High Court Rules That a Bona Fide and Debatable Claim Regarding the Date of Setting Up a Business Does Not Amount to Concealment of Income or Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars Under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         The assessee (Whirlpool of India P. Ltd.) filed its return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 1996-97 on December 31, 1996. The case was selecte...

Sonia Magu & Others vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Addition for Unexplained Jewellery Cannot Survive Once Source of Acquisition is Accepted | Section 132, Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted on 17.01.2002 at the premises of M/s India Carriers Pvt. Ltd. and the residential premises of members of the Magu f...

Sonia Magu & Ors. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Addition on Account of Voluntary Offer of Income Cannot Survive Once Source of Jewellery is Fully Explained under Sections 132 & 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the Case A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on 17 January 2002 at the premises of M/s India Carriers Pvt. Ltd. and the residential premises o...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mrs. Indu Nagu & Connected Assessees | Delhi High Court | Addition on Account of Unexplained Jewellery Cannot Survive Once Source is Fully Explained – Section 69A, Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted on 17.01.2002 at the premises of M/s Indair Carriers Pvt. Ltd. and at the residential premises of its directors, sh...

Sonia Magu & Others vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Addition for Unexplained Jewellery Cannot Survive Once Source is Fully Explained | Sections 132 & Block Assessment Provisions of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the Case A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted on 17.01.2002 at the premises of M/s Indair Carriers Pvt. Ltd. and the residences of its directors, sh...