Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Assessee Company – Addition under Section 68 on Share Application Money Raised Through Public Issue Not Sustainable in Absence of Proper Inquiry | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company had raised share capital through a public issue. Share applications were submitted by various applicants, and shares were allotted to such applicants in accordance with the applic...

Maintainability of Tax Appeals by Government Undertakings Pending Committee on Disputes (COD) Approval under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, a Government of India undertaking, preferred two tax appeals (ITA No. 867/2009 and ITA No. 868/2009) before the High Court of Delhi under Section 26...

The Motor & General Finance Ltd. & Ors. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-VI, New Delhi | Delhi High Court Clarifies When Interest on Income Tax Refund Is Payable Under Sections 240, 243 & 244A of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of appeals was filed by various assessees including The Motor & General Finance Ltd., MGF India Ltd., Goodwill (India) Ltd., and MGM (India) Ltd. before the Delhi High Court.The ...

Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) v. Assessee – Addition on Account of Allegedly Undisclosed Stock Based on Inflated Stock Statements Furnished to Bank Not Sustainable | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee had submitted stock statements to its banker showing stock quantities and values higher than those reflected in its books of account. The inflated figures were furnished for obtaining fina...

The Motor & General Finance Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-VI, New Delhi | No Interest on Interest Where Statutory Refund Interest is Paid Along with Tax Refund under Section 243 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees had originally filed their income-tax returns and paid taxes through TDS and advance tax. Upon processing of the returns under Section 143(1)(a), excess tax paid was refunded together wi...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee (ITA No. 75/2008) – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Due to Low Tax Effect Below Prescribed Monetary Limit

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. During the hearing, it was noted that the tax effect involved in...

Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) vs. Sharda Motor Industrial Ltd. – Additional Depreciation Claim Through Revised Return and Tax Treatment of Running Royalty as Revenue Expenditure under Sections 32(1)(iia) and 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sharda Motor Industrial Ltd., filed its income-tax return on 27.11.2003 declaring income under the MAT provisions. Subsequently, within the permissible period, it filed a revised return o...

Commissioner of Income-Tax-V vs. Ramsons Organics Limited: Section 10B Deduction Allowed for Marble, Granite and Stone Processing as Manufacturing Activity

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee's Business: The Assessee is engaged in running a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) at Dhoka, Gurgaon, dealing in the business of processing stone, marble, granite, etc., and e...

Reinterpreting Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Delhi High Court’s Landmark Judgment in CIT vs. Selan Exploration Technology Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent (hereinafter referred to as the "assessee") is a limited company engaged in business activities concerning crude oil production across three oil fields (Bakrol, Indora, and Lohar) with ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Assessee (ITA No. 225/2007) | Delhi High Court – Interest Income from Fixed Deposits Not Eligible for Section 80HHC Deduction; Bank Charges Cannot Be Reduced from Export Turnover

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80HHC in respect of interest income amounting to Rs. 53,32,448 earned from fixed deposits with banks and companies. The assessee also incurr...