Chartered Accountant Penalised for Accepting Audit Without Prior Communication and Signing Audit Report Before Valid Appointment: Manoj Kumar Jain vs. CA Nishant Agarwal (ICAI Board of Discipline)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 171
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe complainant, CA Manoj Kumar Jain, proprietor of M/s Manoj Santosh & Co., was appointed as statutory auditor of M/s Fortune Machines Private Limited for a continuous period from 01.04.2015 to 3...

Chartered Accountant Exonerated for Social Media Post on Revised Code of Ethics: Freedom of Professional Expression Recognised – In Re: CA Manmohan Khemka (ICAI Board of Discipline)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 227
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA reference was received by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India from its Legal Section alleging that CA Manmohan Khemka, New Delhi, had disseminated misleading information through a Facebo...

Allegations of Forged Signatures on Forensic Audit Reports Rejected for Lack of Corroborative Evidence: Jayesh Vasantlal Shah vs. CA Jaleshwar Singh (ICAI Board of Discipline)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 195
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe complainant, CA Jayesh Vasantlal Shah, was a partner in the respondent’s firm, M/s J Singh & Associates, while the respondent, CA Jaleshwar Singh, was the Managing Partner holding 80% profit...

Complaint Dismissed for Lack of Locus Standi and Absence of Evidence of Audit Misconduct: Bhaven Shah vs. CA Bharat Babubhai Shroff (ICAI Board of Discipline)

Author
My Tax Expert
19/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 141
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe complainant, CA Bhaven Shah, Director of M/s Modern Products Private Limited, filed a complaint against the respondent, CA Bharat Babubhai Shroff, who was the statutory auditor of M/s NAK Engineer...

Analysis of ICAI Board of Discipline Order in Shri Sudip Roy (CBI) vs. CA Gopal Pitti, examining facts, allegations, evidentiary findings, misconduct under Item (2) Part IV First Schedule, and final disciplinary action of reprimand

Author
My Tax Expert
18/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 319
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present disciplinary proceedings arose from a complaint filed by Shri Sudip Roy, Superintendent of Police and Head of Branch, Central Bureau of Investigation, Economic Offence Wing, Kolkata, again...

ICAI Board of Discipline Order BOD-287/2017: Vinod K. Kala vs. CA Munish Mehta – Professional Misconduct, High Court Intervention and Final Disciplinary Penalty

Author
My Tax Expert
18/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 303
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe disciplinary proceedings arose from a complaint filed by Shri Vinod K. Kala against CA Munish Mehta, a practicing Chartered Accountant and partner of a Chartered Accountancy firm at New Delhi.The ...

ITAT Ahmedabad in Jentibhai Shambhubhai Prajapati v. ACIT Holds Section 150(1) Cannot Revive Time-Barred Assessments Quashed under Section 153C — Jurisdictional Defects Are Incurable

Author
CA. Vivek kr. Jain
17/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 283
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was subjected to assessment proceedings under section 153C read with section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014-15 and 2016-17, pursuant to a search cond...

Addition under Section 68 on Share Capital and Premium Deleted Where Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness Established: Goldmoon Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-6(2), Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 225
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Goldmoon Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on 30.09.2012 declaring total income of ₹12,963. The return was processed under Section 143(1) and th...

Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Delayed Filing of Form 67: DTAA Benefits Override Procedural Lapses – Vaibhav Das Mundhra vs. ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 337
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual resident and ordinarily resident in India, was employed with a Singapore-based company and earned salary income taxable both in India and Singapore during Assessment Year 20...

Addition Deleted for Clerical Error in Tax Audit Report: CPC Adjustment under Section 143(1) Set Aside – Concord Fortune Minerals India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle-11(1), Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 335
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Concord Fortune Minerals India Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 on 29.11.2017 declaring total income of ₹18,74,280. The assessee is engaged in the busi...