Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Creative Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd. – Business Advances for Commercial Purpose Not Taxable as Deemed Dividend Under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Creative Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd. was engaged in the business of dyeing and printing cloth and functioned as an ancillary unit for M/s Pee Empro Exports Pvt. Ltd. for several years.Both comp...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII vs. Mukesh Luthra | Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid in Absence of Tangible Material – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000 on the ground that income had escaped a...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessees (ITA Nos. 870–879 of 2009) | Delhi High Court | Scope of Rectification under Section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the Case The ITAT dismissed the appeals filed by the assessees. The assessees challenged the Tribunal’s orders by filing appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act....

Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Section 115JB MAT – Withdrawal from Revaluation Reserve Not Deductible Unless Added Back in Year of Creation

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd., engaged in the business of manufacturing yarn and polyester products, computed its book profit for Assessment Year 2001-02 under Section 115JB after red...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Adidas India Trading Pvt. Ltd. – Advertisement Expenditure on Licensed Brand Held Allowable as Business Deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Adidas India Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1997-98 declaring a loss. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII vs Mukesh Luthra | Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid in Absence of Tangible Material – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue initiated reassessment proceedings against the assessee for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000 by issuing notices under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the allegati...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee (Batch of Appeals) – Scope of Rectification under Section 254 of the Income-tax Act When ITAT Orders Are Already Under Challenge Before High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees had filed appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which were dismissed by the Tribunal. Aggrieved by the orders of the ITAT, the assessees preferred appeals before the De...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Various Assessees – Revenue Appeals Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect and Acceptance of Findings in Connected Cases | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue preferred appeals before the Delhi High Court against certain assessees. The Court had earlier passed an order dated 02.03.2009 seeking clarification regarding ap...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs NIIT Ltd. | Delhi High Court Holds Franchise Revenue Sharing is Not Rent and No TDS is Deductible under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseNIIT Ltd., a public limited company engaged in the business of computer education and training, conducted its educational operations both through its own centres and through franchisees operating under...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII vs Mukesh Luthra | Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Cannot Be Sustained Without Tangible Material – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
12/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present case involved reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000 on the alle...