GAIL (India) Limited vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr. (2023) – Garnishee Proceedings Cannot Enforce Disputed GST Liability

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, GAIL (India) Limited, is a Central Public Sector Undertaking engaged in transportation of petroleum and natural gas. GAIL awarded a contract to Respondent No.2 for...

Nanu Ram Goyal vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Delhi & Ors. – Inordinate Delay in Adjudication of Show Cause Notice Held Impermissible under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 122
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, a civil construction contractor, executed a housing project for Haryana Housing Board. Investigation was initiated for alleged non-payment of service tax under “...

Titan Umreifungstechnik GmbH and Co. KG vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Patent Refusal Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning under Sections 2(1)(ja) & 10(4) of the Patents Act

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Appellant filed Patent Application No. 7529/DELNP/2014 as a national phase application derived from a PCT application for an invention titled “Plastics Material Strapping Band and Method for Prod...

Alex Tour and Travel Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner CGST, Division Janakpuri (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Refund of ITC on Export of Services Cannot Be Denied Despite Pending Appeal

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner filed refund claims totaling ₹2,62,01,727/- for FY 2018–19 and 2019–20. Refund was claimed on unutilized ITC for export of services (zero-rated supply). Th...

Sidhivinayak Chemtech Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner, CGST, Meerut & Ors. – Provisional Attachment under Section 83 CGST Act Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction & Tangible Material

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sidhivinayak Chemtech Private Limited, engaged in the trade of industrial chemicals, challenged a provisional attachment order dated 01.09.2022 and its confirmation dated 08.12.2022 pas...

M/s McDonald’s India Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner, CGST Appeals-II, Delhi & Anr. (2023) – Intermediary Services under IGST Act & ITC Refund Eligibility

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s McDonald’s India Pvt. Ltd., entered into a Service Agreement dated 01.01.1996 with its holding company McDonald’s USA. Services were rendered on a cost + 1...

M/s Netgear Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner CGST Appeals-I Delhi & Anr. – Intermediary Services vs Export of Services under IGST Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 168
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s Netgear Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in providing marketing and sales support services to its overseas entity without payment of IGST. It cl...

M/s Classic Decorators vs Commissioner (Appeals-I) Central Excise/GST, Delhi & Anr. – Pre-Deposit Mandatory Under Section 35F of Central Excise Act | Delhi High Court (2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 176
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Classic Decorators, challenged an order dated 04.05.2023 passed by the Appellate Authority, which refused to entertain its appeal due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposi...

M/s. Balaji Enterprises vs Principal Additional Director General, Directorate General of GST Intelligence – Delhi High Court on Validity & Duration of Provisional Attachment under Section 83 CGST Act, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Balaji Enterprises, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.04.2022 passed by the respondent authority provisionally attaching its bank accounts maintained with IndusIn...

Advance Systems vs Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Refund of ITC Must Be Granted After Appellate Order | Section 54 CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
31/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner claimed refund of ITC for exports made during January 2021 to September 2021 under LUT. Refund applications were filed under Section 54(3)(i) CGST Act. The ...