Section 68 Addition Cannot Be Sustained Without Proper Appreciation of Additional Evidence: ITAT Mumbai in Anirudh Bhimjibhai Dudhat v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
The assessee preferred an appeal against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Year 2014–15, whereby an addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustained. The ...

Assessment Set Aside for Lack of Effective Opportunity—Delay Condoned Considering COVID and Ill-Health: ITAT Chennai in Tanjore Chandrakantam Balakrishnan Ravi v. DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
The assessee preferred an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Trichy, for Assessment Year 2011-12. There was a delay of 1510 days in filing the appeal. The assessee explained t...

Section 148 Reassessment Notice Issued by Jurisdictional AO Held Invalid – ITAT Chennai Applies Mark Studio and Hexaware Technologies in Vijayakumar Balaji vs ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 230
Read More »
The appeal was filed by the assessee, Vijayakumar Balaji, against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Year 2020-21, wherein reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147 of the Incom...

Reassessment Notice Issued by Jurisdictional AO Quashed – ITAT Chennai Applies Mark Studio and Hexaware Technologies in Shanmugam Palanisamy vs ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 163
Read More »
The appeal was filed by the assessee, Shanmugam Palanisamy, against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Year 2020-21, whereby the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147...

Reassessment Notice Issued by Jurisdictional AO Held Invalid – ITAT Chennai Follows Mark Studio and Hexaware Technologies in Palanisamy Srilatha vs ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
The appeal was filed by the assessee, Palanisamy Srilatha, against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Year 2015-16, confirming reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147 of the I...

Remand of Unabsorbed Depreciation Issue Causes No Prejudice to Revenue – ITAT Chennai in DCIT vs Sri Lakshmi Electro Smelters Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 194
Read More »
The appeal filed by the Revenue arose from the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre for Assessment Year 2014-15. The assessee, Sri Lakshmi Electro Smelters Private Limited, is engaged in the business of...

Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to Profit Element – ITAT Chennai Upholds GP Estimation in ACIT vs EI Instrumentation Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 251
Read More »
The appeal filed by the Revenue was directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessee, EI Instrumentation Private Limited, is engaged in the busine...

Reassessment Notice Issued by Jurisdictional AO Invalid under Faceless Scheme—Assessment Quashed: ITAT Chennai in All India Insurance Pensioners Association v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 184
Read More »
The assessee, a registered association of insurance pensioners, preferred an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, for Assessment Year 2019-20. T...

Ex-Parte Assessment and Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Set Aside—Matter Remanded for De Novo Assessment: ITAT Lucknow in Uma v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 149
Read More »
The assessee filed an appeal against the appellate order dated 12 September 2025 passed by the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessment in the present case was ...

Adjustment under Section 143(1) Based Solely on Audit Report Requires Factual Verification—Matter Remanded: ITAT Lucknow in Surya International Pvt. Ltd. v. CPC

Author
My Tax Expert
15/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 220
Read More »
The assessee company filed an appeal against the order passed by the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2020–21, whereby adjustments made through intimation under section 143(1...