Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I vs. Bharat Rasayan Ltd. | Interest on Delayed Sale Consideration Eligible for Section 80-IA Deduction – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Bharat Rasayan Ltd., was engaged in manufacturing activities and qualified as an industrial undertaking. During the relevant assessment year, it disclosed an amount received as interest o...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Net 4 India Ltd. & AIMIL Ltd. | Supreme Court Vinay Cement Interpretation on Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B Deductions for Employees' PF & ESI Contributions Deposited Prior to Due Date of Filing Return under Section 139(1)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the Case Lead Matrix: The core controversy arose across a batch of income tax appeals involving different assessees, with the lead factual matrix derived from ITA No. 1063/2008 (CIT vs. AIMIL...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Validity of Reassessment under Sections 147 & 148 and Deletion of Additions on Merits Upheld by ITAT | Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The assessee was served with notices under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act. Pursuant to such notices, reassessment proceedings were initiated under Sections 147 and 148. ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Maharashtra Seamless Ltd. – Computation of Deductions Under Sections 80HHC, 80-IA, and 80-IB of the Income Tax Act on Rental Income, DEPB License Sales, Scrap Sales, and Netting of Interest

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Income Tax filed a series of appeals against the assessee, Maharashtra Seamless Ltd., spanning multiple assessment years (including AY 1998-99, 2000-01, and 2001-02). The disputes o...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Whether Findings of Fact Based on Customs Department Information Give Rise to a Substantial Question of Law under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the Case Income-tax proceedings were initiated against the assessee based on information received from Customs Authorities. The Revenue relied upon customs-related allegations and materials...

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Modipon Ltd. (with CIT vs. AIMIL Ltd. & Others) – Allowability of Deduction Under Section 36(1)(va) Read with Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Employee and Employer Contributions to Provident Fund and ESI Paid Before the Due Date of Filing Income Tax Return

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the Case The judgment arises from a batch of appeals involving different assessees, with the lead factual matrix derived from ITA No. 1063/2008 (Assessment Year 2002-03). During asse...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee – Additions Based on Information from Customs Authorities and Scope of Interference with Findings of Fact under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the Case Proceedings under the Income-tax Act were initiated against the assessee on the basis of a complaint or information received from the Customs Authorities. The Revenue relied upon t...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. AIMIL Limited (With Consolidated Appeals): Delhi High Court Interpretation on the Interplay Between Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B Regarding Tax Deductibility of Delayed Employees' and Employers' Contributions to Provident Fund (PF) and ESI Paid Before the Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department preferred a series of appeals against different assessees, with the lead case being ITA No. 1063/2008 involving AIMIL Limited for the Assessment Year 2002-03. During the asse...

Petitioner v. Assistant Director of Income Tax & Ors. – Quashing of Bank Attachment Under Section 226(3) of Income Tax Act for Foreign Company Subject to Alternative Security and Cash Deposit

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner is a foreign company operating through a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India to execute specific projects. For the Assessment Years (AY) 2004-05 and 2005-06, the A...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Stock Broker Assessee – Whether Interest on FDRs Kept as Margin Money with Stock Exchanges Constitutes Business Income and Can Be Set Off Against Speculative Losses under Sections 28, 56 & 73 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The assessee was engaged in speculative business involving trading in shares and stocks. The assessee was registered with stock exchanges and maintained Fixed Deposit R...