Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Penguin Books India Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax: Validity of Reassessment Proceedings and Computation of Section 80-O Deduction on Foreign Exchange Receipts
Facts of the Case
For
the Assessment Year 1994-95, the assessee filed its return of income
declaring an income of ₹17,64,090/-, and the initial assessment was
finalized under Section 143(3) on Janua...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-V vs Punj Lloyd Ltd. | Reassessment Proceedings under Sections 147/148 of the Income-tax Act – Appeals Dismissed by Delhi High Court
Facts of the Case
The
assessee was served with a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act,
1961.
Pursuant
to the notice, reassessment proceedings were initiated and reassessment
orders w...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Penguin Books India (Pvt.) Ltd.: Computation of Section 80-O Deduction on Net vs. Gross Foreign Receipts and the Validity of Unsubstantiated Reassessment Additions
Facts of the Case
For
the Assessment Year 1994-95, the assessee (Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd.)
filed its return of income declaring a total income of ₹17,64,090/-.
The
original assessment was co...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs The Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. | Interest on Delayed Provident Fund Deposit Cannot Be Disallowed Under Section 143(1)(a) When Issue is Debatable | Delhi High Court
Facts of the Case• The assessee had claimed deduction of interest payable on
delayed deposit of Provident Fund contributions.• The Assessing Officer, while processing the return under
Section 143(1)(a) of the Incom...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shriram Pistons & Rings Limited: Eligibility of Royalty, Foreign Technician Fees as Revenue Expenditure and Treatment of Interest Income under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Shriram Pistons & Rings Limited, filed
its income tax return claiming deductions under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax
Act, 1961. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing ...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. ECS Limited | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on Wrong Claim of Deduction under Section 80-O – Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, ECS Limited, was engaged in providing
consultancy services to foreign clients and earned income in convertible
foreign exchange. The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ram Chander Soni (M/s R.C. Jewellers): Validity of Deletion of Unexplained Investment Addition Based on Statement Section 132(4) of Income Tax Act
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue preferred an appeal before the High Court of Delhi against the
order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had upheld the
findings of the Commissioner of Inc...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. AIMIL Limited (with connected appeals) Alternative Extended Title: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. AIMIL Limited: Allowability of Deduction on Employees’ Contribution Towards Provident Fund (PF) and ESI Under Section 36(1)(va) Read with Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when Deposited Before the Due Date of Filing Income Tax Return (ITR).
Facts of the Case
Background:
The case consolidated multiple appeals involving different assessees but
dealing with an identical question of law. To explain the context, the
Hon'ble High Court evaluat...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. ECS Limited | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Upheld for Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars in Claim of Deduction u/s 80-O – Delhi High Court
Facts of the Case• The assessee, ECS Limited, was engaged in providing
consultancy services to foreign clients and earned foreign exchange income.• For Assessment Years 1994-95, 1995-96 and 1996-97, the
assessee cl...
M/s. Egon Zehnder International Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV (2009:DHC:5670-DB) – On the Legality of Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 263, the Determination of Permanent Establishment (PE) of Non-Resident Holding Entities, Deemed Rejection Under Section 195(2), and Disallowance of Shared Information Technology and Global Operational Expenses Under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Python# Since the user requested a
formatted text output (and potentially an HTML/PDF structure if standard for
legal briefs, but text format is requested with sections), # let's review the details from
the prompt.# W...