Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

M/s United Airlines v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Others – Delhi High Court Liability for Interest under Section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Where Taxes Have Already Been Paid by the Payee

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s United Airlines, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 March 2000 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income-tax Act.The Commissioner, wh...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Khosla Indair Limited: Classification of Business Income vs. Income from Other Sources

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 11
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s. Khosla Indair Limited, filed a return declaring a net loss, while also claiming unabsorbed brought forward losses, depreciation, and investment allowance. The Assessing Officer (AO...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Thirani Chemicals Ltd.: Deductibility of Debenture Issue Expenses as Revenue Expenditure vs. Amortization Under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act – Binding Nature of CBDT Circular No. 56 Post India Cements Judgement

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 19
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee-company (M/s. Thirani Chemicals Ltd.), with an objective to modernize, expand, and augment its long-term capital requirements, raised funds amounting to ₹406.65 lacs b...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Hind Pocket Books (ITA No. 842/2005) – Delhi High Court – Deductibility of Foreign Education Expenses of Managing Director’s Daughter as Business Expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Remand by ITAT Held Improper

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 17
Read More »
Issues Involved Whether expenditure incurred on the foreign education of the Managing Director’s daughter was allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Whe...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s India Lease Development Ltd. (ITA No. 512/2003) | Deletion of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) and the Overriding Impact of Immunity Granted Under Section 90(2) of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 11
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, deleted a penalty levied upon the respondent-assessee (M/s India Lease Development Ltd.) under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. (2005): Analysis of TDS Penalty under Section 271C

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 11
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent, a non-resident company incorporated in Japan with a liaison office in India, utilized the services of expatriate employees who rendered services in India. These employees were paid th...

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Durant Refrigeration (Pvt.) Ltd.: Adjudicating the Genuineness of Business Transactions

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 11
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent, M/s Durant Refrigeration (Pvt.) Ltd., claimed a 100% depreciation on the purchase of 505 oxygen gas cylinders, which were subsequently leased to a sister concern. The Assessing Office...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. M/S Chaska Food Pvt. Ltd. | Imposition of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) on Assessed Losses and Applicability of Explanation 4 Post-1976 Amendment

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 14
Read More »
Facts of the Case Background of the Appeal: The Revenue department, represented by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi, filed an appeal (designated as ITA 1074/2005) before the High Court of Delhi. ...

Sony India Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi – Stay of Outstanding Tax Demand During Pendency of Appeal before CIT(A) under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 11
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSony India Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court seeking protection against recovery of outstanding tax demand during the pendency of its appeal before the Commissioner of Income ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. M/s Chemical De Universe Ltd.: Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Loss/Minus Figure Income and the Applicability of Explanation 4 Post-1976 Amendment

Author
My Tax Expert
18/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 18
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case originated from an appeal filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi) challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT had deleted the penalty lev...