Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s United Airlines, filed a writ
petition challenging an order dated 24 March 2000 passed by the Commissioner of
Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income-tax Act.The Commissioner, wh...
Facts
of the CaseThe assessee, M/s. Khosla Indair
Limited, filed a return declaring a net loss, while also claiming unabsorbed
brought forward losses, depreciation, and investment allowance. The Assessing
Officer (AO...
Facts of the Case
The
assessee-company (M/s. Thirani Chemicals Ltd.), with an objective
to modernize, expand, and augment its long-term capital requirements,
raised funds amounting to ₹406.65 lacs b...
Issues Involved
Whether
expenditure incurred on the foreign education of the Managing Director’s
daughter was allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the
Income-tax Act, 1961.
Whe...
Facts of the Case
The
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, deleted a penalty
levied upon the respondent-assessee (M/s India Lease Development Ltd.)
under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-...
Facts
of the CaseThe Respondent, a non-resident company
incorporated in Japan with a liaison office in India, utilized the services of
expatriate employees who rendered services in India. These employees were paid
th...
Facts
of the CaseThe Respondent, M/s Durant
Refrigeration (Pvt.) Ltd., claimed a 100% depreciation on the purchase of 505
oxygen gas cylinders, which were subsequently leased to a sister concern. The
Assessing Office...
Facts of the Case
Background
of the Appeal: The Revenue department, represented by the
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi, filed an appeal (designated as ITA
1074/2005) before the High Court of Delhi. ...
Facts of the CaseSony India Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Delhi
High Court seeking protection against recovery of outstanding tax demand during
the pendency of its appeal before the Commissioner of Income ...
Facts of the CaseThe case originated from an appeal filed by the Revenue
(Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi) challenging an order passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT had deleted the penalty lev...