Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

The Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Agra Beverages Corporation P. Ltd. (Allowability of Business Expenditure under Section 37(1) on Visi-Cooler Hire Charges and Advertisement Expenses Incurred by Franchisee Benefiting the Trademark Owner)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the Case Franchisee Agreement: The respondent-assessee entered into a franchisee agreement with M/s. Pepsi Food (Pvt.) Ltd. ("Pepsi") for manufacturing, bottling, selling, and distributing Pe...

CIT vs. Gillette Diversified Operations Pvt. Ltd. | Sale of Shares to Group Company Before Amalgamation to Mitigate Liability is Not a Colourable Device for Tax Avoidance Under Section 45 & 48

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The respondent/assessee, Gillette Diversified Operations Pvt. Ltd. (GDOPL), was engaged in the business of leasing equipment and filed a return declaring a loss of ₹4,71,54,2...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Intex Technology India Ltd. & Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Narender Bansal | Block Assessment Under Section 158BC and Share Application Money Cash Credits Under Section 68 Disallowed Upon Genuineness Verification

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred two connected appeals before the High Court of Delhi challenging a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the block assessment period fro...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. [Assessee Name] | Deductions Under Section 36(1)(ii) for Commission and Bonus Paid to Managing Director Allowed

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the Case The case involves two income tax appeals (ITA Nos. 73/2010 & 1717/2010) pertaining to the assessment years 2004–2005 and 2005–2006. In its returns, the respondent-assessee...

Commissioner of Income Tax, IV vs. M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Marketing Co. Pvt. Ltd. (and M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.) – Section 263 Revisional Powers Cannot Be Invoked Merely Due to a Difference of Opinion

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO) passed assessment orders for two assessment years concerning the assessees (M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Marketing Co. Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.)...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Marketing Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.: Scope of Revisionary Power under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 42
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe dispute arose from assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding two separate assessment years for the sister concerns, M/s. Hindustan Coca Cola Marketing Co. Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mahindra Finlease P. Ltd. | Validity of Protective Assessment under Section 158BC and Section 158BD

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
  Facts of the Case A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted on June 20, 2000, at the residential and business premises of Shri P.K. Sood, who was...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Intex Technology India Ltd. & Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Narender Bansal | Deletion of Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68 and Block Assessment Under Section 158BC Upheld Based on Verified Identity and Creditworthiness of Share Applicants

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred two connected appeals before the High Court of Delhi arising out of a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 21.11.2008. The dispute related to the blo...

Saamag Construction Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: Delhi High Court Ruling on Special Audit under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 42
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe matter involves a batch of writ petitions, including W.P.(C) 2250/2011 (Saamag Construction Ltd.), filed before the High Court of Delhi. The petitioners sought to challenge the legality and the ini...

Miss Rooby Dhawer Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax: Evidentiary Value of Statements in Search and Seizure

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         A search and seizure operation was executed at the appellant's business and residential premises on November 2, 2004. ·     ...