Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Director of Income Tax vs. Galileo International Inc. | Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Following Binding Precedent | ITA Nos. 900, 901, 902, 903, 904 & 905 of 2008

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the Case1.      The Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court being ITA Nos. 900, 901, 902, 903, 904 and 905 of 2008.2.      During th...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sahara India Mass Communication: Deletion of Income Tax Additions on Account of Excessive Newsprint Wastage Book Results and Admission of Additional Ground of Expenditure

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         The assessee, M/s Sahara India Mass Communication, filed its original return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 1994-95, declaring a loss of ₹...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shri Naresh Kumar Aggarwala (Delhi High Court) – Seized Fax Message Held Sufficient Evidence of Undisclosed Investment; Presumption under Section 132(4A) Upheld

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee was engaged in stock broking and other income-generating activities. A survey was conducted on 16.10.1992 followed by a search operation on 23.10.1992, during which certain do...

Commissioner/Director of Income Tax (Revenue) vs. Assessee (Respondent) – Following Director of Income Tax vs. Galileo International Inc. [224 CTR 251]

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court raising issues concerning the taxability of income in India. The controversy involved questions that had already been adjudicated by ...

Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts v. DGIT (Exemptions) | Section 10(23C)(iv) Exemption Denied For Violation of Section 11(5) Rectified Post High Court Intervention – Landmark Delhi High Court Ruling on Retrospective Compliance of Revised Applications

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         The petitioner, Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts, applied for a tax exemption under Section $10(23C)(iv)$ of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. K.P. Verghese - Addition Based Solely on DVO Valuation Report Cannot Be Sustained Without Independent Evidence | Section 69 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee filed the return of income for Assessment Year 2005-06. The assessee disclosed the purchase cost of a property at ₹6,00,000 as recorded in the sale deed and books of...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Winstral Petrochemicals Pvt Ltd | Section 68 Income Tax Act – Deletion of Unexplained Cash Credit on Share Application Money Received via Banking Channels

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         The Assessee company filed its income tax return for the Assessment Year 2004-05 declaring an income of ₹2,20,880. The case was initially processe...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Galileo International Inc. (ITA Nos. 900-905/2008): Scope of Income Accrual in India under Section 5 & Section 9

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed a series of connected appeals (ITA Nos. 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, and 905/2008) against the Assessee before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. The dispute per...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ranbaxy Holdings Company: Scope of Rectification Under Section 154 for Deletion of Capital Gains Adjustments

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Ranbaxy Holdings Company, filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 1998-1999, disclosing the disposal of 75,600 equity shares of Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited (RLL). For comput...

Director of Income Tax v. Amadeus IT Group SA: Taxability of Global CRS Booking Fees Under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961Case Overview & Direct Link

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the Case Nature of Business: The respondent/assessee is an international organization specializing in providing a Global Computer Reservation System (CRS). This centralized software system en...