Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 1
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Palam Jain Educational & Welfare Society vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions) | Threshold Criteria for Tax Exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi)
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner, Palam Jain Educational & Welfare Society, is a society
registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and manages several
unaided recognized minority scho...
Income Tax Reassessment Beyond Four Years: Validity of Section 148 Notice Without Section 151 Sanction and Independent Application of Mind – CIT vs. M/s Giesecke & Devrient India Pvt. Ltd.
Facts of the Case
The
regular assessment of the assessee for the relevant assessment year was
completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 on March
26, 2004.
After
a lapse of mo...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bhushan Kumar (Delhi High Court) – Validity of Reassessment under Section 148 Based on DVO Reference after Completion of Assessment | AY 1994-95 & 1995-96
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Bhushan Kumar, was subjected to assessment
proceedings for Assessment Years 1994-95 and 1995-96.For both assessment years, the Assessing Officer initiated
reassessment proceedings by issu...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Devi Das Garg (2010) – Addition on Account of Share Application Money Deleted in Absence of Incriminating Evidence | Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department filed an appeal under Section 260A
of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal relating to the block assessment period from 0...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smt. Seema Tripathi & Shri Mithilesh Kumar Tripathi | Delhi High Court | Addition on Alleged Bogus Jewellery Sale Deleted – Genuine VDIS Transactions Upheld
Facts of the Case
The
assessees, Smt. Seema Tripathi and Shri Mithilesh Kumar Tripathi,
disclosed long-term capital losses arising from sale of jewellery in their
income tax returns for Assessment Yea...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smt. Seema Tripathi & Anr. | Delhi High Court Upholds Deletion of Additions on Alleged Bogus Jewellery Sale Transactions Declared Under VDIS, 1997 | Sections 147, 148, 260A & 132 of Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe respondents-assessees disclosed long-term capital losses
arising from the sale of jewellery in their income tax returns for Assessment
Years 1999-2000 and 2000-2001.The jewellery was stated to have...
National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) vs CA Krishna Bihari Chaturvedi | DHFL Branch Audit Matter (FY 2017-18) – Professional Misconduct, Audit Negligence and Debarment under Section 132(4) of the Companies Act, 2013
Facts of the Case The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)
conducted an investigation into the professional conduct of CA Krishna Bihari
Chaturvedi in relation to the audit of five branches of Dewan...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) – Revenue Appeals Disposed of for Want of COD Approval with Liberty to Re-file | Delhi High Court (2010)
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) filed multiple Income
Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court against Bharat Heavy Electricals
Limited (BHEL). During the hearing, counsel appearing for the Rev...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) – Revenue Appeals Dismissed for Want of COD Approval with Liberty to Re-file | Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Income Tax filed multiple Income Tax
Appeals before the Delhi High Court against Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
(BHEL). During the hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Reven...
M/s Singh Ajay & Co. & CA Priyank Mittal vs National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) – Audit Failures in Vikas Proppant & Granite Ltd. (FY 2020-21) | NFRA Order dated 05.07.2024
Facts of the CaseThe National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)
examined the statutory audit conducted by M/s Singh Ajay & Co. and
its Engagement Partner CA Priyank Mittal in respect of Vikas Proppant
& Gra...