Estimation of Profit in Civil Construction Business — Reasonable Net Profit Rate Upheld After Rejection of Books | M/s Pandey Construction Co. vs ACIT Range-III, Mirzapur (ITAT Allahabad) | Section 145(3)

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Pandey Construction Co., engaged in civil construction work, was subjected to scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer fo...

Addition for Unexplained Investment Sustained Due to Failure to Explain Source — Shri Baldev Singh vs DCIT Circle-III, Mirzapur (ITAT Allahabad) | Sections 69/69B of Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shri Baldev Singh, was subjected to scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed certain investments/a...

Truck Freight Payments Not Liable for TDS When Covered by Section 44AE — Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) Deleted | M/s J.B. Transport vs ACIT Range-3, Mirzapur (ITAT Allahabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s J.B. Transport, engaged in the transport business, was subjected to scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed tha...

Addition for Unexplained Cash Credits Upheld Due to Failure to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness & Genuineness — M/s Dharmendar Pratap Singh vs ACIT Circle-1, Allahabad (ITAT Allahabad) | Section 68 of Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Dharmendar Pratap Singh, was subjected to scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act. During assessment proceedings, certain amounts were found credited in the boo...

Ex-Parte Order of CIT(A) Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice — Ram Babu Kesarwani vs ITO, Allahabad (ITAT Allahabad) | Opportunity of Hearing Mandatory under Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 66
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) relating to the relevant assessment year. The assessment had been co...

Smt. Kavita Tulsiani vs. JCIT (ITAT Allahabad): Appeal Dismissed as Withdrawn After Settlement under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 — AY 2010-11

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Allahabad relating to Assessment Year 2010-11.During the pendency of...

Shri Anurag Chandel vs. ITO (ITAT Allahabad): Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposits Deleted — No Independent Evidence under Sections 68/69A

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 75
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed substantial cash deposits in the assessee’s bank account. The AO treated these deposits as unexplained money and added the amou...

M/s J.B. Transport vs. ACIT (ITAT Allahabad): Disallowance of Freight / Transport Expenses Deleted — No Evidence of Bogus Payments or Violation of TDS Provisions

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, engaged in the transport business, claimed freight and transportation expenses as business expenditure in its return of income. During scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3), the Asses...

Yogesh Kumar Pandey (Prop. M/s Pawan Traders) vs ITO, Mirzapur — ITAT Allahabad Remands Additions u/s 69 for Unexplained Investment & Cash Deposits; Opportunity to Furnish Evidence — AY 2009-10

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, proprietor of M/s Pawan Traders, was engaged in the business of coal, liquor, and truck plying. During assessment proceedings under Section 143(3), the Assessing Officer (AO) noted that i...

Shashi Vaish vs. DCIT (ITAT Allahabad): Addition for Alleged Bogus Capital Gain from Penny Stock Deleted — Conditions of Section 68 Not Satisfied

Author
My Tax Expert
25/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 44
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee declared Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) arising from the sale of listed equity shares and claimed exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The shares were stated to have ...