Facts of the Case
A
search and seizure operation was carried out at the premises of the
appellant/assessee on 6th November 1996. Consequent to this, a notice
dated 5th August 1997 under Section 158BC ...
Facts of the Case
Assessee’s
Business: The respondent/assessee, Sh. Gautam R.
Chadha, operated a proprietary travel agency business under the name and
style of M/s Tirun Travel Marketing. The firm a...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee filed its initial income tax return for the Assessment
Year (AY) 1999-2000, declaring an income of ₹1,22,460, which was processed
under Section 143(1) of th...
Facts of the MatterAs per the announced E-Way Bill system changes applicable from
15 June 2026, the following compliance requirements have been introduced:
Mandatory
Ship-To GSTIN
In
Bill-To/Ship-T...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (appellant) preferred an appeal against the order
of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The dispute centered around two
primary adjustments made by the Assessing Officer (AO). The as...
Facts of the Case
The
Appellant (Revenue Department) challenged the order passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had deleted two major additions made
by the Assessing Officer (AO). ...
Facts of the Case
Assessee’s
Business and Return Filing: The assessee is a private
limited company engaged in providing services to obtain orders from
Government Departments and acting as a liaison ...
. Facts of the Case
For
the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2003-04, the Respondent-Assessee (Ms. Mayawati)
filed her Income Tax return declaring a total income of ₹13,29,090/-.
During
the scrutiny proces...
Facts of the CaseThe revenue filed an appeal (ITA No. 902/2011) against the
assessee before the High Court of Delhi. The central dispute arose regarding
the valid service of a statutory notice issued under Section 143(...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Brahmaputra Consortium Ltd., filed its return
for Assessment Year 2001-02 declaring a loss of ₹93,74,724.During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed
the following claim...