Facts of the CaseMultiple Income Tax Appeals were filed by the Revenue before
the Delhi High Court.The Court examined the monetary impact involved in the
appeals.It was found that the tax effect in the concerned matter...
Facts of the CaseDuring scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer
issued notices under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) seeking detailed explanations
regarding:
Deduction
claimed under Section 80M;
Pr...
The Supreme Court held that reopening under Section 148 was valid because the Department had fresh tangible material from survey proceedings. The Court further held that the 35% share received by the Assessee from AOP wa...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company, Navin Chemicals Manufacturing Co. Ltd.,
was engaged in the manufacture of chemical formulations. However, all
manufacturing and business operations had remained suspended since 19...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year
1998-99.During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer made two
additions:
Disallowance
of prior period interest expenditure am...
Facts of the Case
ITA
Nos. 1016, 1017 and 1020 of 2009 were listed before the Delhi High Court.
The
appellant/assessee, through its counsel, requested permission to withdraw
the appeals.
The
...
Facts of the CaseAn appeal bearing ITA No. 931/2011 was pending before the
Delhi High Court. At the time of hearing, counsel for the appellant requested
permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court accepted the request...
Facts of the Case
The
assessee company was originally incorporated as C.G. Graphnet Pvt. Ltd.
and subsequently underwent changes in name and ownership before becoming
Tata Communications Internet Serv...
Facts of the Case
The
assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing audio cassettes.
It
claimed deduction of ₹2,00,000 as manufacturing expenses allegedly
paid to Mr. Sunil Kumar for asse...
Facts of the CaseThe dispute pertained to Assessment Year 2005-06. During
assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee
had received a total sum of ₹21,70,34,294/- as advance money tow...