PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Imperial Housing Ventures Pvt. Ltd. | Section 69C Income Tax Act | Bogus Purchases Allegation Dismissed by Delhi High Court (2022:DHC:993-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order dated 26 August 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2011–12. The Assessing Officer had made ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Shri Rathi Steel (Dakshin) Ltd. | Section 153A & 68 IT Act | No Addition Without Incriminating Material (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 21
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A challenging the ITAT order for AY 2009–10. The Assessing Officer had made an addition of ₹4,00,00,000 under Section 68 on ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs S.S. Con Build Pvt. Ltd. | Section 68 & 153A Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court (2022) | No Addition Without Seized Material

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 27
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 18 February 2021 for Assessment Year 2006–07.The Assessing Officer had made an add...

Vodafone Luxembourg 5 S.A.R.L. vs Income Tax Department, Circle International Tax 3(1)(1), Delhi & Anr. (2022) – Reassessment Notice Quashed Due to Contradictory Reasons under Sections 147, 148, 143(2), 142(1) & 151 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 27
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vodafone Luxembourg 5 S.A.R.L., filed a writ petition challenging: Reassessment notice under Section 148 dated 30 March 2021 Notices under Sections 143(2) and 142(1) read with Sect...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Shri Rathi Steel Ltd. (2022) – No Addition u/s 153A Without Incriminating Material | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenging the ITAT order for AY 2009–10. The Assessing Officer had made an addition of ₹6 crore under Section 68 on account of...

SAIF II & SAIF III Mauritius Company Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int Tax 3(1)(2) Delhi & Anr. – Delhi High Court Upholds Reopening Under Section 148 on ‘Reason to Believe’ Standard (2022:DHC:1112-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, SAIF II Mauritius Company Limited and SAIF III Mauritius Company Limited, filed writ petitions challenging notices dated 30th March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act...

M/s Toshiba Corporation vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Intl. Tax) – Delhi High Court on Stay of Tax Demand & 20% Pre-deposit Rule [Sections 201(1), 201(1A), 220(6), 156 Income Tax Act]

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Toshiba Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging multiple orders directing it to deposit 20% of the outstanding tax demand. The dispute arose from an order dated 12 November ...

Aditi Infrabuild and Services Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(2) & Anr. (2022) – Refund of Excess Tax Recovery Beyond 20% Disputed Demand under Section 220(6) & Section 245 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner sought refund of ₹1,83,91,108/-, which was recovered in excess of 20% of disputed tax demand for AY 2016-17. The excess recovery was made by adjusting refunds of ...

Tata Teleservices Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 & Anr (2022:DHC:1044-DB) – Stay on Tax Demand Not Mandatory at 20% Under Section 201(1)/201(1A) Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Tata Teleservices Limited, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 28 February 2022 and 14 March 2022, whereby its stay application was disposed of by the tax authorities.The di...

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (International Tax Circle 3(1)(1), Delhi) & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Refund of TDS Credit & Interest | AY 2009-13

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Qualcomm Incorporated, filed multiple writ petitions seeking directions against the Income Tax Department for failure to process income tax returns correctly and grant refunds along wit...