Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
900,702
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee (ITA No. 742/2008 & Connected Appeals) – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Due to Low Tax Effect Below Prescribed Monetary Limit

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 98
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of appeals, including ITA No. 742/2008, was preferred by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. During the hearing, it was noted that the tax effect involved in each of th...

MARUTI ENTERPRISES vs. Principal Commissioner, Delhi GST (Delhi HC): Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Requires Proper Hearing and Reasoned Order Under Section 29(2)(e)

Author
CA. Abhishek Raja Ram
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 169
Read More »
GST registration was already voluntarily cancelled from 24.01.2025, yet Department proposed retrospective cancellation from original registration date — Delhi High Court directed fresh consideration with hearing and re...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Various Assessees | Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Due to Low Tax Effect Below ₹4 Lakhs | ITA Nos. 74/2008, 285/2008, 312/2008, 510/2008, 512/2008, 637/2008, 976/2008, 1339/2008, 76/2009 & 849/2009

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 94
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue had preferred multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging orders passed in favour of various assessees under the Income-tax Act, 1961.At the time of hearing, the Court observe...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee (ITA No. 312/2008 & Connected Appeals) – Delhi High Court | Appeals Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect Below Prescribed Monetary Limit

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 105
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Income Tax Department filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeals involved various assessees and assessment years. Dur...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Assessee (Connected ITA Nos. 74/2008, 285/2008, 312/2008, 510/2008, 512/2008, 637/2008, 976/2008, 1339/2008, 76/2009 & 849/2009) – Delhi High Court | Revenue Appeals Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect Below CBDT Monetary Limit

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 114
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging orders passed in favour of the respective assessees. During the hearing, the Court examined the tax effect involved...

Hidayatullah National Law University vs ACIT (Exemption) | Section 10(23C)(iiiab) Exemption Denied as Government Grant Below 50% Threshold under Rule 2BBB | ITAT Raipur

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 112
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Hidayatullah National Law University, a State-established institution engaged in imparting legal education, claimed exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) for Assessment Years 2016-17 and...

TRUTH FASHION vs. S.K. Singh Special Commissioner (Delhi HC): Refund Cannot Be Withheld Merely Due to Pending GST Appeal Without Stay Order

Author
CA. Abhishek Raja Ram
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 156
Read More »
GST refund was allowed by the Appellate Authority and no stay was granted by the Tribunal, yet refund was withheld — Delhi High Court directed release of the deposited refund amount to the Assessee.Issue:Whether the De...

MARKETS LTD. vs. Union of India (Bombay High Court): Mandatory Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 107(6)(b) of the GST Act

Author
CA. Abhishek Raja Ram
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
Assessee had already paid ₹30.81 crore TCS under protest during the disputed period — Bombay High Court held that no further 10% pre-deposit was required under Section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act.ISSUE:Whether TCS amou...

DHUPANI OVERSEAS vs. Principal Commissioner, Delhi GST (Delhi HC) – ITC Cannot Be Denied Without Proper Verification Under Section 16 GST

Author
CA. Abhishek Raja Ram
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
Impact Analysis: GST registration was suspended and DRC-01 demands of nearly ₹98 lakh were issued for alleged wrongful ITC, but Delhi High Court protected the Assessee from coercive action till supplementary SCN was ad...

MCA Notification on CSR Eligibility of Subscription to Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments on Social Stock Exchange vs Earlier CSR Funding Framework – Amendment to Schedule VII of Companies Act, 2013

Author
My Tax Expert
03/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 100
Read More »
 Facts of the Matter Companies meeting the prescribed thresholds under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 are required to spend a specified amount on CSR activities. Schedule VII specifies the ...