Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
902,711
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs Rajendra Seclease Ltd. – Delhi High Court, Section 260A, Income Tax Act, 1961 | Sale of Unquoted Shares

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the CaseRajendra Seclease Ltd., engaged in trading of shares, dividends, and securities, filed its return of income for AY 2002-03, reporting the sale of 2,255,500 unquoted shares at Rs. 5 per share (totaling...

National Cooperative Development Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Interpretation of Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on Long-Term Finance Deductions

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 101
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC), filed multiple appeals (ITA Nos. 512/2011, 513/2011, 810/2011, 811/2011, 1139/2011, 1140/2011, 1141/2011) under Section 260A of the ...

Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr – Challenge to Proviso of Section 201(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 175
Read More »
Facts of the CaseVodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd., the petitioner, filed writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the proviso to Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as inserted by the Fina...

Tata Teleservices Ltd vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax TDS & Anr – Challenge to Proviso of Section 201(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 105
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tata Teleservices Ltd, filed multiple writ petitions (W.P.(C) Nos. 2024/2011, 2026/2011, 2027/2011, 2030/2011 & 2032/2011) challenging the vires of the proviso to Section 201(3) o...

National Cooperative Development Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1) – Interpretation of Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on Long-Term Finance Income

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 91
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, National Cooperative Development Corporation, engaged in providing long-term finance under the National Cooperative Development Corporation Act, 1962, claimed deductions under Section ...

Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr – Challenge to Proviso of Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 144
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the vires of the proviso to Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as inserted by the Finance (No.2) Act...

National Cooperative Development Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1) – Interpretation of Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on Deduction of Profits from Long-Term Finance

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC) filed seven appeals under Section 260A challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for assessment years ranging from 199...

Tata Teleservices Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax TDS – Constitutional Validity Challenge under Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the Case Tata Teleservices Ltd filed multiple writ petitions challenging the proviso to Section 201(3) on constitutional grounds. The company argued that certain procedural and substantive rights ...

Tata Teleservices Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax TDS & Anr | Challenge to Proviso of Section 201(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 86
Read More »
Facts of the Case:Tata Teleservices Ltd sought permission to withdraw its writ petitions filed against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax TDS, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The fresh petition aimed to c...

Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr – Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Proviso to Section 201(3), Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
01/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Limited, filed writ petitions seeking to challenge the constitutional validity of the proviso to Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, inserted by ...