Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
903,928
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. – Section 68, Unexplained Share Application Money, Burden of Proof, Discharge of Initial Onus

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals pertain to multiple assessment years under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving additions made by Assessing Officers under Section 68 on account of unexplained share application money rece...

Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs Sham Mohan Pvt. Ltd. | Section 68, Income Tax Act, 1961 – Unexplained Share Application Money

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 168
Read More »
Fact of the CaseThe present appeals arose from multiple Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) orders where the Assessing Officer (AO) made additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for unexplained share ap...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI vs Lestner Garnett & Vijay Gopal Jindal | High Court of Delhi | Section 234B & C | ITA 337/2007, 338/2007, 131/2009

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
Facts of the Case:The Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI (Appellant) filed appeals against Mr. Lestner Garnett and Mr. Vijay Gopal Jindal (Respondents) concerning the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. – Analysis under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on Unexplained Share Application Money

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 190
Read More »
Facts of the Case:The Delhi High Court heard multiple appeals concerning the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on account of unexplained share application mone...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. & Connected Matters – Addition under Section 68 on Share Application Money Deleted where Identity, Genuineness and Creditworthiness Established | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 212
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees had received share application money from various corporate entities through banking channels. During assessment proceedings, the assessees furnished details including names and addresse...

Director of Income Tax vs. M/s Ericsson Radio System A.B. — Taxability of Offshore Telecom Supplies and Embedded Software as Sale of Goods vs. Royalty under Sections 9(1)(i) and 9(1)(vi) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 136
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s. Ericsson Radio Systems A.B. (Sweden), is a non-resident tax entity that entered into supply, installation, and overall contracts with multiple Indian cellular operators to execute tu...

Director of Income Tax vs. M/s Ericsson Radio System A.B. — Taxability of Offshore Telecom Supplies and Embedded Software as Sale of Goods vs. Royalty under Sections 9(1)(i) and 9(1)(vi) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 114
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s. Ericsson Radio Systems A.B. (Sweden), is a non-resident tax entity that entered into supply, installation, and overall contracts with multiple Indian cellular operators to execute tu...

CIT vs. Shri Vardhman Overseas Ltd. – Delhi High Court Judgement on Taxability of Old Unconfirmed Sundry Creditors Under Section 41(1) and Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 132
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee was a limited company engaged in manufacturing rice from paddy and selling rice in the local market. During the assessment proceedings for the Assessment Y...

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys Ltd. & Ors. (Delhi High Court) | Section 68 Unexplained Share Application Money

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred a batch of appeals before the Delhi High Court against orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had deleted substantial additions made by Assessing Officers...

Director of Income Tax vs. Ericsson A.B. | Taxability of Off-shore Equipment Supply and Software Licensing Under Section 9(1) of the Income Tax Act & Indo-Sweden DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 124
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessee Profile: M/s. Ericsson Radio Systems A.B. (referred to as Ericsson A.B. or ERA) is a company incorporated in Sweden and a tax resident of Sweden. It is a 100% subsidiary...