Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
903,950
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI vs. Mr. Robert Michael Arthey & Ors. (Consolidated with Mr. Lestner Garnett and Mr. Vijay Gopal Jindal)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI) filed a batch of four cross-appeals—namely ITA No. 459/2008, ITA No. 337/2007, ITA No. 338/2007, and ITA No. 131/2009—before the High Court of Delhi. Th...

CIT vs. Visual Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.: Determining Eligibility and Quantum for Section 80-IC Deductions

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 113
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order regarding the assessment year 2006-2007. The assessee, M/s Visual Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., had claimed a deductio...

Taxability of Fees for Technical Services (FTS) for Foreign Companies: A Deep Dive into Section 44D and the India-Australia DTAA (Director of Income Tax vs. Rio Tinto Technical Services)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 124
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Rio Tinto Technical Services (a foreign company), operated in India through a division. During the Assessment Years 1999-2000 to 2001-02, it received payments from Rio Tinto India Private...

Director of Income Tax vs. Rio Tinto Technical Services: Taxation of Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Indo-Australia DTAA and Section 44D of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 120
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, a foreign company (Rio Tinto Technical Services), operated in India through a division. During the relevant assessment years (1999-2000 to 2001-02), the assessee received payments from ...

Girnar Investment Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.: Applicability of Interest under Section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act when Assessment Orders are Restored by Appellate Tribunals

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Girnar Investment Ltd., a public limited company, was assessed for the 1995-96 assessment year, resulting in a tax demand of Rs. 21,44,521. The petitioner filed an appeal before the CIT...

Interpretation of Section 13(1)(c) and Treatment of Project Grants: Director of Income Tax v. Society for Development Alternatives

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 113
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, the Society for Development Alternatives, is an institution registered under Section 12A and Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The organization is dedicated to rural development, f...

The Synodical Board of Health Services vs. Director General of Income Tax: Scope of Scrutiny for Section 10(23C)(iv) Registration

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, The Synodical Board of Health Services, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, engaged in managing hospitals and community health programs, applied for registr...

Kanchenjunga Advertising Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT-I – Whether Wrong Claim of Bad Debt on Share Application Money Attracts Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 117
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kanchenjunga Advertising Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2000-01 declaring taxable income. During scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed ...

Penalty for Concealment: Assessing Inaccurate Particulars vs. Legal Contentions – Kanchenjunga Advertising P. Ltd. vs. CIT (U/S 271(1)(c))

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Kanchenjunga Advertising P. Ltd., a domestic company, filed its return for the assessment year 2000-01. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer (AO) identified a claim of Rs. 2,38,32,392/...

Analyzing Section 13(1)(c) Compliance and the Tax Treatment of Tied Project Grants: A Comprehensive Review of Director of Income Tax vs. Society for Development Alternatives

Author
My Tax Expert
30/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 101
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent, a society registered under Section 12A and 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is engaged in research and development for rural welfare and environmental regeneration. The Revenue (Appella...