Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 2
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax – Reopening of Assessment under Section 148 and Book Profit Computation under Section 115J of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Case Facts:
Four writ petitions (WP(C) 3406/2000, 6310/2000, 6320/2000,
6308/2000) were filed by Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. and Tony
Electronics Ltd. (later merged with the former) against the Dy...
Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs Living Media India Ltd – Delhi High Court 2013 | Section 147/148 Income Tax Act, Assessment Year 2006-07
Facts of the Case:
The assessee, Living Media India Ltd, filed its income tax return for the
Assessment Year 2006-07 on 29.11.2006. The original assessment was completed
under Section 143(3) on 26.12.2008. Subsequentl...
Detailed analysis of Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi vs J B Roy (ITA 546/2010) before the Delhi High Court, covering facts, issues, arguments, and court findings under Sections 143(3) & 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn about reassessment procedures, relevant case law, and principles protecting assessee rights in tax disputes.
Facts of the Case:
The appellant, Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi, filed
an appeal against the respondent, J B Roy, challenging the order of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The dispute arose regard...
Judicial Review on the Scope of Charitable Tax Exemptions for Commercial Activities: Delhi High Court Clarifies the Legal Boundary Between Business Undertakings "Held Under Trust" and Non-Incidental Commercial Businesses under Section 11(1), Section 11(4), and Section 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mehta Charitable Prajanalay Trust
Facts of the
CaseThe case involves multiple appeals filed by the
Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the
assessment years 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 2001-02, and 2005-06 to 2007-08...
Detailed analysis of Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi vs J B Roy (ITA 546/2010) before the Delhi High Court, covering facts, issues, arguments, and court findings under Sections 143(3) & 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn about reassessment procedures, relevant case law, and principles protecting assessee rights in tax disputes.
Facts of the Case:
The appellant, Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi, filed
an appeal against the respondent, J B Roy, challenging the order of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The dispute arose regard...
Jurisdictional Validity of Settlement Applications Post Expiry of Statutory Assessment Time Limits: Delhi High Court’s Definitive Ruling on "Pending Proceedings" under Section 245A(b) and Section 245C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission
Facts of the
Case:
The assessee filed returns for four assessment years: 2004-05,
2005-06, 2007-08, and 2008-09.
The statutory period for completing assessments under Sections
143/144 had expired for all...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi vs J B Roy – Delhi High Court ITA 546/2010 | Section 143(3) & 147 Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the Case:
The appellant, Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi, filed
an appeal against the respondent, J B Roy, challenging the order of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The dispute arose regard...
Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs Convertech Equipments Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 36(1)(ii), 147 | Assessment Years 2002-03 & 2003-04
Facts of the
CaseThe respondent, Convertech Equipments Pvt. Ltd.,
filed its income tax returns for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04.
During scrutiny, the assessing officer disallowed commissions totaling
₹2...
Distinction Between Penal Interest and Compensatory Business Expenditure: Delhi High Court Clarifies the Applicability of Section 37(1) and Section 43B(e) in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Enchante Jewellery Ltd
Facts of the
Case
The assessee, Enchante Jewellery Ltd, engaged in
manufacturing and trading gold jewellery, imported machinery under the
EPCG Scheme at concessional duty rates with an export obligat...
Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs Convertech Equipments Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 36(1)(ii), Reassessment Jurisdiction
Facts of the Case:
The respondent, Convertech Equipments Pvt. Ltd., filed income tax returns for
the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed
commission payments of 29,42,534/- and 2...