Mahendra Singh Rathore vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-III(2), Mirzapur — ITAT Allahabad on Applicability of Section 50C to Sale of Land Alleged as Tenancy (Bhumidari) Rights

Author
My Tax Expert
21/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 127
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees, being co-owners, sold immovable property for a consideration significantly lower than the stamp duty valuation adopted by the authorities. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 50C of ...

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH,MIRZAPUR VS. JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (I & CI), LUCKNOW

Author
My Tax Expert
21/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] against the assessment order beyond the prescribed limitation period. The delay extended substantially beyond the ...

Addition under Section 69A Based Solely on Suspicion Deleted — ITAT Allahabad in Laxmi Rathaur v. ITO (ITA No. 12/ALLD/2021) Clarifies Burden of Proof in Unexplained Money Cases

Author
My Tax Expert
21/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 136
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, was subjected to scrutiny assessment wherein the Assessing Officer noticed cash deposits in the bank account during the relevant financial year. The Assessing Officer trea...

Ram Manohar Kesarwani vs ITO, Allahabad — ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside Ex-Parte CIT(A) Order for Violation of Natural Justice; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 115
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A) relating to Assessment Year 2012-13. The assessment had been completed under Section 143(3), resulting in various addi...

Opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Leads to Withdrawal of Appeal — ITAT Allahabad in Jagdish Housing Company vs DCIT (ITA No. 381/ALLD/2014, AY 1994-95)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 219
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Jagdish Housing Company, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad Bench against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 11.03.2014 f...

High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs CIT (Exemptions), Lucknow — ITAT Allahabad: Rejection of Registration u/s 12AA Set Aside; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision on Merits

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 93
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, High Court Bar Association, Allahabad, filed an application seeking registration under Section 12AA. The Association, established in 1958, claimed to function as a mutual body of practi...

Rajendra Prasad Gupta vs DCIT, Allahabad — ITAT Allahabad: Appeal Dismissed as Withdrawn After Opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme; Department Directed to Consider Issuance of Form-5

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 100
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 1993-94. During the hearing, the assessee informed the Tribunal that he had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vi...

M/s Commercial Auto Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs ADIT (CPC), Bengaluru — ITAT Allahabad: Delayed Employees’ PF/ESI Contribution Allowed if Paid Before Return Due Date (Pre-FA 2021) u/s 36(1)(va)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 130
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee company filed its return declaring income of ₹6.98 crore. The return was processed under Section 143(1), wherein the CPC made an adjustment of ₹11,20,461 by disallowing employees’ ...

Kalyan Ji Mishra vs ITO, Mirzapur — ITAT Allahabad: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Set Aside as Quantum Addition Remanded; Matter Restored to CIT(A)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 207
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) confirming penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2009-10. The penalty arose from additions made during assessment un...

Unexplained Share Capital & Share Premium u/s 68 — ITAT Allahabad in Govind Stone Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO (AY 2013-14): Failure to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness &

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 93
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee company received substantial share capital along with a high share premium from several investor companies allegedly based in Kolkata. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that: The...