Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation was conducted on the Batra Group on
17.12.1999. During the search proceedings, the Revenue discovered certain
documents including a receipt executed in 1999 relating to t...
Facts of the
Case:The Commissioner of Income Tax (appellant)
challenged the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
which deleted the tax amounts sought to be assessed under Section 153A
of the Income Ta...
Facts of the
Case:The case concerns a dispute regarding the valuation
of property, E-24, South Extension Part-I, New Delhi. The property was
originally agreed to be sold by Sh. Gurdayal Singh, acting as the guardian o...
Facts of the
Case:The writ petitions were filed by Picheswar Gadde
and Sunita Gadde seeking the early hearing of their writ petitions related to
orders passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh on the dates 24.07.2...
Facts of the
Case:
Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. (the assessee) is a company
engaged in offshore services. The core issue revolves around the Income
Tax Assessment for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11, ...
Facts of the Case:
The Revenue, in this case, appealed against the order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated December 20, 2013. The dispute involved an
amount of ₹1.65 crores, which the assessee had re...
Facts of the
Case:The case revolves around the appeal of Joint
Investments Pvt Ltd against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal (ITAT), which upheld the decision of the Assessing Officer (AO) for AY
2009...
Facts of the Case:
The petitioner, Bikram Singh, was assessed under Section 68 of the Income Tax
Act for Assessment Year 2011-12, with a demand raised for ₹4,39,71,545. The
assessing officer added ₹3,25,50,000 und...
Facts of the Case:
In the matter of the assessment for the Financial Year 2002-03, the petitioner,
Commissioner of Income Tax-8 (Erstwhile CIT-III), filed an appeal
against Soyuz Industrial Resources Ltd. regarding th...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, M/s Pioneer Overseas Corporation, had
originally declared certain income as agricultural income. However, the
Assessing Officer treated the same as business income and further made
addi...