Facts of the
CaseThe assessee was engaged in the business of
development of land and acquisition of development rights from land-owning
companies.During assessment proceedings, the Assessing
Officer observed that sub...
Facts of the
CaseJCB India Ltd. claimed development charges as
revenue expenditure in its returns for AY 2007-08 and AY 2008-09. The Assessing
Officer treated such expenditure as capital expenditure on the basis that ...
Facts of the
CaseHCL Technologies Limited claimed software licence
fee expenditure amounting to approximately Rs. 31.69 crores as revenue
expenditure for Assessment Year 2006–07. During the original assessment
proc...
Facts of the
CaseThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal passed a common
order dated 28 November 2014 concerning Assessment Years 2005-06, 2006-07,
2007-08 and 2008-09. While deciding the appeals, the Tribunal relied upon t...
Facts of the
CasePACL India Limited was engaged in the business of
development and sale of agricultural land. The company purchased agricultural
land, developed it through contractors, and thereafter sold it as develo...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Om Prakash Khaitan, proprietor of M/s
O.P. Khaitan & Company, was engaged in legal practice as a solicitor and
advocate and had consistently followed the cash system of accounting si...
Facts of the
Case
Mool Chand Khairati Ram Trust was created under a Will executed by
Late Lala Khairati Ram.
The principal objects of the trust included:
Promotion and teaching of Sanskrit;
Improvemen...
Facts of the
Case
The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act
against the common order of the ITAT relating to Assessment Years 2003-04,
2004-05 and 2006-07.
The ITAT had held that...
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee entities, namely Navbharat
International Ltd. and M/s Navbharat Export, were subjected to search
proceedings wherein excess stock was declared. Based on such declaration, the
Assessing O...
Facts of the
CaseBLB Limited had submitted refund claims before the
Income Tax Department in respect of Assessment Years 2006-07 through 2011-12.
Different refund amounts were involved in each petition. The petitioner...