Addition under Section 69A for Cash Deposits Deleted — ITAT Allahabad in Ajay Kumar Gupta v. ITO Holds Suspicion Cannot Substitute Evidence

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 174
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, was subjected to assessment proceedings during which the Assessing Officer noticed substantial cash deposits in the assessee’s bank account for the relevant assessment y...

Reassessment Held Invalid Due to Lack of Jurisdiction — ITAT Allahabad in Gaya Prasad Bajaj v. ITO (ITA No. 375/2018) on Sections 147 & 148

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was subjected to reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the ground that income had allegedly escaped assessment. A notice under Secti...

Ex-Parte Assessment and Section 68 Additions Set Aside for Denial of Proper Opportunity — ITAT Allahabad in Amit Kumar v. ITO (ITA No. 122/2019)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was subjected to assessment proceedings that resulted in an ex-parte order due to alleged failure to comply with statutory notices issued by the Assessing Officer. The assessment was comp...

Revision u/s 263 Against Charitable Trust Set Aside for Lack of Proper Opportunity — ITAT Allahabad in Mahaveer Charitable Trust v. CIT (Exemption) on Sections 11, 12AA & 263

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 182
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a registered charitable trust, filed its return of income declaring nil income after claiming exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessment was completed...

Disciplinary Proceedings under Section 21 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 – Manoj H. Shah vs Mahesh Palimkar | Board of Discipline Final Order (DC/430/2018)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 159
Read More »
Disciplinary Proceedings under Section 21 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 – Manoj H. Shah vs Mahesh Palimkar | Board of Discipline Final Order (DC/430/2018) Matter (Professional Language — Meaning Preser...

Section 263 Revision Set Aside for Lack of Adequate Opportunity — ITAT Allahabad in Anil Kumar Singh v. PCIT (AY 2010-11) | Order Passed Within 5 Days of SCN Held Invali

Author
My Tax Expert
18/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 130
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s reassessment for Assessment Year 2010-11 was completed by the Assessing Officer under Sections 147 read with 143(3), wherein certain receipts were treated as business turnover and pro...

Ad-hoc Disallowance of Expenses and 50% Addition of Sundry Creditors Set Aside — ITAT Allahabad in Kasim Hussain v. DCIT (AY 2014-15) | Matter Remanded for Proper Verification under Sections 142(1) & 143(3)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 120
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a civil contractor operating through proprietary concerns M/s M J A Enterprises and M/s Janta Constructions, filed the return of income declaring total income of ₹10,34,580 for As...

M/s Rithwik RK Joint Venture v. Pr. CIT (ITAT Allahabad, ITA No. 107/ALLD/2016): Scope of Revision under Section 263 in Joint Venture Contracts — Taxability and Adequacy of Inquiry

Author
My Tax Expert
18/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 91
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Rithwik RK Joint Venture, was constituted by two corporate partners to execute infrastructure contract work on a back-to-back basis through sub-contract arrangements. The Joint Ventur...

Smt. Amita Rajvedi v. DCIT (ITAT Allahabad, ITA Nos. 64–67/ALLD/2020): Penalty under Section 271(1)(b) Deleted for Reasonable Cause — Non-Compliance Due to Illness of Authorized Representative

Author
My Tax Expert
18/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 104
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Smt. Amita Rajvedi, was subjected to assessment proceedings during which statutory notices were issued requiring compliance. Due to non-appearance and failure to comply with certain notic...

Kanodia Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (ITAT Allahabad): Inordinate Delay of 1473 Days Not Condoned — Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Sufficient Cause under Section 249

Author
My Tax Expert
18/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 276
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kanodia Investments Private Limited, filed its return of income which was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act. Subsequently, the assessee sought to challenge the intimati...