Ex-Parte Reassessment for Bank Deposits Set Aside — ITAT Allahabad Grants Fresh Opportunity in Santosh Kumari Sahu vs. ITO (NFAC), Delhi (ITA No.44/ALLD/2024, AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 88
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer received information regarding financial transactions in the assessee’s bank accounts maintained with State Bank of India and Bank of Baroda. Since the assessee had not filed a ...

Demonetization Deposits & Bank Credits Cannot Be Added Without Verifying Portal Submissions — ITAT Allahabad Remands Case Where “Cash Transaction-2016” Compliance Ignored in Sachidanand Rai vs. ITO 1(4), Bhadohi (ITA No.11/ALLD/2024, AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 75
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee deposited ₹12,46,000 during the demonetization period in his Canara Bank account. Despite issuance of multiple notices, he did not respond during assessment proceedings. Consequently, th...

Wrong Reporting in Tax Audit Report Causing Double Taxation u/s 143(1) Requires Fresh Verification — ITAT Allahabad Remands CPC Adjustment Case in S.P.S. Automobiles vs. ITO Ward-1(5), Prayagraj (ITA No.106/Alld/2024, AY 2021-22)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 85
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a partnership firm engaged in automobile dealership (purchase and sale of tractors), filed its return along with audited financial statements and tax audit report declaring income of ₹3...

High-Pitched Ex-Parte Assessment u/s 144 for Demonetization Cash Deposits Set Aside — ITAT Allahabad Grants Fresh Opportunity in Ramesh Stone Crusher Co. vs. ACIT-3, Mirzapur (ITA No.38/ALLD/2024, AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee-firm filed its return declaring income of ₹28,59,260. The case was selected for scrutiny, and multiple notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) were issued. Due to non-compliance, the As...

Agricultural Income from Sale of Eucalyptus Trees Cannot Be Rejected Solely for Lack of Formal Books — ITAT Allahabad Orders Fresh Verification in Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi vs. ITO Ward-2(1), Allahabad (ITA No.2/ALLD/2024, AY 2018-19)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 97
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return declaring total income of ₹6,37,740 and agricultural income of ₹68,42,904 claimed as exempt. The case was selected for limited scrutiny to examine the claim of agricul...

Ex-Parte NFAC Order Without Hearing Unsustainable — ITAT Allahabad Remands Demonetization Jewellery Sale Case in Preeti Gupta vs. ITO-3(2), Mirzapur (ITA No.129/Alld/2023, AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny due to large cash deposits during the demonetization period. She deposited ₹15,03,000 in her bank account, claiming that ₹13,83,000 was received from...

Ex-Parte Reassessment for Cash Deposits Set Aside — ITAT Allahabad Remands Case Where Assessee Could Not Comply Due to Remote Location in Pankaj Kumar Choubey vs. ITO Ward-3(2), Mirzapur (ITA No.86/ALLD/2024, AY 2011-12)

Author
HARDEV SINGH
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 67
Read More »
Facts of the CaseInformation was received that the assessee had deposited cash of ₹32,22,490 in a savings bank account during the financial year 2010-11. Based on this information, proceedings under section 147 were ...

NFAC Order Ignoring Uploaded Evidence Violates Natural Justice — ITAT Allahabad Remands NRI Investment & Bank Deposit Case in Mohammad Sahadat Ali vs. ITO (NFAC), Delhi (ITA Nos.147 & 148/ALLD/2024, AYs 2013-14 & 2014-15)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 101
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Department received information that the assessee had constructed a market (“Apna Bazar”) and made investments of ₹12,11,300 (AY 2013-14) and ₹2,34,620 (AY 2014-15), along with unexplained ...

ITAT Delhi: Addition u/s 68 Cannot Survive When Seized Ledger & Receipts Prove Loan Repayment – New Link Overseas Finance Ltd vs DCIT (AY 2011-12),

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
ITAT Delhi: Addition u/s 68 Cannot Survive When Seized Ledger & Receipts Prove Loan Repayment – New Link Overseas Finance Ltd vs DCIT (AY 2011-12) Sections InvolvedIncome-tax Act, 1961 Section 68 – Unexp...

Bank Account Mapped to Firm’s PAN but Belonging to Proprietor Requires Fresh Verification — ITAT Allahabad Remands Additions u/s 69A in M/s Auto King vs. ITO Ward-1(1), Allahabad (ITA Nos.145 & 146/ALLD/2024, AYs 2015-16 & 2018-19)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a partnership firm, had not filed returns for AYs 2015-16 and 2018-19. Based on information regarding substantial bank transactions, reassessment proceedings were initiated under sections...