Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer received information regarding financial
transactions in the assessee’s bank accounts maintained with State Bank of
India and Bank of Baroda. Since the assessee had not filed a ...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee deposited ₹12,46,000 during the demonetization
period in his Canara Bank account. Despite issuance of multiple notices, he did
not respond during assessment proceedings. Consequently, th...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a partnership firm engaged in automobile
dealership (purchase and sale of tractors), filed its return along with audited
financial statements and tax audit report declaring income of ₹3...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee-firm filed its return declaring income of
₹28,59,260. The case was selected for scrutiny, and multiple notices under
sections 143(2) and 142(1) were issued. Due to non-compliance, the As...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return declaring total income of
₹6,37,740 and agricultural income of ₹68,42,904 claimed as exempt. The case was
selected for limited scrutiny to examine the claim of agricul...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny due to large
cash deposits during the demonetization period. She deposited ₹15,03,000 in her
bank account, claiming that ₹13,83,000 was received from...
Facts of the CaseInformation was received that the assessee had deposited cash
of ₹32,22,490 in a savings bank account during the financial year 2010-11.
Based on this information, proceedings under section 147 were ...
Facts of the CaseThe Department received information that the assessee had
constructed a market (“Apna Bazar”) and made investments of ₹12,11,300 (AY
2013-14) and ₹2,34,620 (AY 2014-15), along with unexplained ...
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a partnership firm, had not filed returns for
AYs 2015-16 and 2018-19. Based on information regarding substantial bank
transactions, reassessment proceedings were initiated under sections...