Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
933,391
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh vs Parabolic Drugs Ltd. (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Condonation of Delay Rejected due to Government Lethargy under Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 137
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an appeal against the ITAT order dated 17 June 2011 for AY 2006–07. There was a delay of 928 days in filing the appeal and 1656 days in re-filing the sam...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–5 vs Jindal Photo Ltd. (2018) – Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeal Dismissed Without Adjudication on Merits

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 122
Read More »
Facts of the Case The appeals were filed by the Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–5) against Jindal Photo Ltd. The matter came before the Delhi High Court involving multiple Income Tax App...

M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Withdrawal of Criminal Petitions under Section 139(1) Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 134
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed multiple criminal miscellaneous petitions before the Delhi High Court seeking relief against proceedings initiated by the Deputy ...

Surendra Kumar Jain vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Reassessment Without Disposal of Objections Held Invalid (Sections 147/148 Income Tax Act)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 136
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner’s assessment for AY 2011–12 was reopened by the Assessing Officer (AO). Reasons for reopening were provided to the petitioner. The petitioner filed obj...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 vs Jindal Photo Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Low Tax Effect Appeals Dismissed Without Adjudication on Merits [Sections 50, 51 & 54, Income Tax Act]

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 135
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5) filed multiple appeals against Jindal Photo Ltd. before the Delhi High Court. During the hearing, it was submitted by the Revenue that the tax effec...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s ACB India Ltd. | Section 14A & Rule 8D Disallowance Limited to Exempt Income | Delhi High Court (2018)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 138
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A concerning Assessment Years 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14. The Assessing Officer applied Rule 8D(2)(ii) and made a disallowance of ₹...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax–3 vs Fern Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. | Section 14A r/w Rule 8D Disallowance Cannot Exceed Exempt Income | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 115
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue challenging a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The ITAT had upheld the order of th...

M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | Section 139(1) Income Tax Act – Withdrawal of Criminal Petitions with Liberty

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed multiple criminal miscellaneous petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging proceedings initiated by the Deputy Commissioner of I...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s ACB India Ltd | Section 14A Disallowance Cannot Exceed Exempt Income | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 137
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAs noted from the judgment (Page 2) : The assessee, M/s ACB India Ltd., earned exempt dividend income of ₹47,950 during AY 2011-12. The Assessing Officer applied Rule 8D(2)(ii) a...

M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Withdrawal of Criminal Petitions under Section 139(1) Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. & others, filed multiple petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging criminal proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department. The mat...