Blog Categories
All Posts
Accounting Standard 12
CBDT 1
Chartered Accountant 1
Chartered Engineer 1
Greetings 1
Income Tax Act 2025 0
Labour Law 2
MCA Notification 1
MSME 1
NGO- Trust & Society 0
PLACEMENT 1
Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2
RBI & Banks 1
RERA 0
RTI 1
STUDENT ICAI 2
Virtual Webinar 5
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | ITA 52/2019 & ITA 53/2019 | Appeal Withdrawn After Success in Remand Proceedings
Facts of the
CaseThe appellants, Aradhana Drinks and Beverages
Pvt. Ltd. and Aradhana Foods and Juice Pvt. Ltd., had filed appeals
before the Delhi High Court against orders passed by the Commissioner of Income
Tax.D...
FIITJEE Ltd. (Successor of Times A & M (India) Ltd.) vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 | Delhi High Court | Disallowance of Bogus Web Advertisement & Software Depreciation Claims | Sections 131, 133(6), 143, 147 Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, FIITJEE Ltd. (successor of Times A & M
(India) Ltd.), claimed deductions for:
Web
advertisement expenses, and
Depreciation
on purchase of customized software
...
Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Appeal Withdrawn After Success in Remand Proceedings
Facts of the
CaseThe appellants, Aradhana Drinks and Beverages
Pvt. Ltd. and Aradhana Foods and Juice Pvt. Ltd., had filed appeals
before the Delhi High Court challenging orders under the Income Tax Act.During the pen...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Suresh Mittal & Anr. | Low Tax Effect Appeals Dismissed by Delhi High Court (2019:DHC:7387-DB)
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi
High Court, including ITA No. 43/2010, ITA No. 47/2010, and ITA No. 1499/2010,
against the respondents (Suresh Mittal and Karan Sawhney).At th...
Genpact India Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Maintainability of Writ Petition vis-à-vis Section 115QA Buyback Tax Demand under Income Tax Act
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Genpact India Private Limited,
challenged an assessment order dated 31 December 2016 passed under Section
143(3) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014–15. The dispute primarily concerned...
Vedanta Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 26(1) & Anr. (2019) – Reopening of Assessment u/s 147/148 on Accommodation Entries
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vedanta Limited (successor of Sterlite
Industries Pvt. Ltd.), challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section
148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2012–13.
The
Assessing Off...
NBCC (India) Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. – Special Audit u/s 142(2A) Upheld by Delhi High Court (2019)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, NBCC (India) Ltd., a government-backed
construction company, filed its income tax return for AY 2017–18 and
subsequently revised it. The case was selected for scrutiny under Section
...
Ankush Jain & Anr. vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 (Delhi High Court, 2019) – IDS Declaration Held Void for Suppression of Facts under Finance Act, 2016
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain,
filed declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS)
pursuant to Section 183 of the Finance Act, 2016, declaring undisclosed
income of ₹...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-2 vs BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. (2020) – Scope of Remand, Depreciation on Energy Meters & AO’s Jurisdiction under Section 32 of Income Tax Act
Facts of the Case
The
assessee, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., claimed 80% depreciation on
electronic/energy meters, asserting that they qualify as energy-saving
devices.
The
ITAT (order dated 05....
M/s. Tropex Promotion & Trading Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Reopening u/s 147 Invalid Without Fresh Tangible Material
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee company filed its return for AY
1986–87, which was assessed under Section 143(3) after scrutiny.
During the original assessment, issues relating to share capital, share
transacti...