Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1 vs Amadeus IT Group SA (Delhi High Court) – Booking Fee Taxability as Business Income, PE Profit Attribution @15%, and Non-Applicability of Interest u/s 234B where TDS Deductible

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 29.01.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17. The...

International Tractors Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) & Anr. – Section 250(4) & 80JJAA | Delhi High Court Allows Deduction, Sets Aside ITAT Remand

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, International Tractors Ltd., filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had set aside the relief granted by the ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs. M/s Jay Ambey Aromatics (Delhi High Court) – Section 153A | No Addition Without Incriminating Material in Search Cases

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed multiple appeals challenging a common order of the ITAT dated 15.07.2021. The ITAT had deleted additions made by the Assessing Officer for AYs 2008-09 to 2011-12. ...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1 vs Amadeus IT Group SA (Delhi High Court) – Booking Fee Taxability, PE Profit Attribution & Section 234B Interest

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals were filed by the Revenue against a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2016-17. The dispute pertained to the taxability of inco...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s Jay Ambey Aromatics (Delhi High Court) – Section 153A Additions Without Incriminating Material Not Sustainable

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals challenging a common order dated 15 July 2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to Assessment Years 2008-09 to 2011-12. The ITAT had delete...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs M/s Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Transfer Pricing – Comparable Selection & Functional Dissimilarity under Section 260A

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 18.12.2020 for Assessment Year 2013–14. The assessee, ...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–1 vs Amadeus IT Group SA (Delhi High Court) – Booking Fees Not Royalty | Section 195 & 234B | PE Profit Attribution @15%

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present matter concerns multiple appeals filed by the Revenue for Assessment Years 2013–14, 2014–15, 2015–16, and 2016–17 against a common order dated 29.01.2021 passed by the Income Tax A...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s Jay Ambey Aromatics – Section 153A Additions Without Incriminating Material Not Sustainable (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Years 2008-09 to 2011-12.The ITAT had delet...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–1 vs Amadeus IT Group SA (Delhi High Court) – PE Attribution, Royalty vs Business Income & Section 234B Interest

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals were filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 29.01.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2016-17. The dispute revolved around th...

Mittal International vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 52(1), New Delhi (Delhi High Court) – Reassessment Proceedings on Deactivated PAN under Sections 148 & 148A(d) of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the validity of an order passed under Section 148A(d) and a consequential notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2016–17. The primary contention was that the e...