Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
938,905
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Mrs. Jayanti Dalmia vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) for Non-Compliance of Notice u/s 142(1) of Income Tax Act Upheld by Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(b) fo...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3, New Delhi vs M/s Agson Global Pvt. Ltd. (2022) – Section 68, 153A & Bogus Purchases | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 238
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case arose from multiple appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against a common order of the ITAT concerning six assessment years (AY 2012–13 to AY 2017–18). The...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs Moser Baer India Ltd (2022) – Delhi High Court | Appeal Dismissed Due to Company Liquidation | Sections 143(3), 10A, 73A Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 164
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee filed return declaring significant loss. Case selected for scrutiny under Section 143(2). AO passed order under Section 143(3) making: Addition to book profits under Section ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3, New Delhi vs M/s Agson Global Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 68, 153A & Bogus Purchases | Demonetization Cash Deposits Case

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 234
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Agson Global Pvt. Ltd., filed returns for multiple assessment years (AY 2012-13 to AY 2017-18). The Assessing Officer (AO) made substantial additions on three major grounds: Unexpla...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Ramesh Chand Goel (Delhi High Court) – No Addition for Alleged Bogus Purchases Without Substantial Question of Law [ITA 53/2022, AY 2009-10]

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 145
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order dated 30 September 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2009–10. The Assessing Officer (AO) h...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Imperial Housing Ventures Pvt. Ltd. | Section 69C Income Tax Act | Bogus Purchases Allegation Dismissed by Delhi High Court (2022:DHC:993-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 164
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order dated 26 August 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2011–12. The Assessing Officer had made ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Shri Rathi Steel (Dakshin) Ltd. | Section 153A & 68 IT Act | No Addition Without Incriminating Material (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 135
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A challenging the ITAT order for AY 2009–10. The Assessing Officer had made an addition of ₹4,00,00,000 under Section 68 on ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs S.S. Con Build Pvt. Ltd. | Section 68 & 153A Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court (2022) | No Addition Without Seized Material

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 18 February 2021 for Assessment Year 2006–07.The Assessing Officer had made an add...

Vodafone Luxembourg 5 S.A.R.L. vs Income Tax Department, Circle International Tax 3(1)(1), Delhi & Anr. (2022) – Reassessment Notice Quashed Due to Contradictory Reasons under Sections 147, 148, 143(2), 142(1) & 151 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 143
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vodafone Luxembourg 5 S.A.R.L., filed a writ petition challenging: Reassessment notice under Section 148 dated 30 March 2021 Notices under Sections 143(2) and 142(1) read with Sect...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Shri Rathi Steel Ltd. (2022) – No Addition u/s 153A Without Incriminating Material | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 151
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenging the ITAT order for AY 2009–10. The Assessing Officer had made an addition of ₹6 crore under Section 68 on account of...