Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
942,909
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi–07 vs. Punjab National Bank (Erstwhile United Bank of India) | Section 40(a)(ia) & Section 14A r/w Rule 8D | Delhi High Court (2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent/Assessee, Punjab National Bank (erstwhile United Bank of India), filed its return of income for AY 2010–11 under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was selected for ...

GE Energy Parts Inc. & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Section 197 TDS Withholding Rate & Permanent Establishment Attribution

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 180
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petitions were filed by the petitioners challenging the orders dated 23.09.2021 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to Financia...

Kshipra Jatana vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 63(1) & Ors. (2022:DHC:1997-DB) – Refund of Excess Tax Recovery Beyond 10% Without Section 245 Notice Held Illegal

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 203
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed seeking refund of ₹1,52,240/- which had been recovered in excess of 10% of the total disputed tax demand for Assessment Year 2017–18 by adjusting refunds due fo...

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax Circle 3-1-1) & Ors. | Delhi High Court | AY 2018-19 Refund & TDS Credit Rectification Case

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 144
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner filed its return of income for AY 2018–19. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. No scrutiny assessment was conducted for the re...

M/s Alpha Corp Development Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Direction for Disposal of Rectification Applications under Section 154 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 181
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The petitioner filed six rectification applications under Section 154 for Assessment Years 2009-10, 2011-12 to 2014-15, and 2017-18. Despite repeated reminders, the respondent authoriti...

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax Circle 3-1-1) & Ors. | Delhi High Court | AY 2018-19 Refund & TDS Credit Rectification Case

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 165
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner filed its return of income for AY 2018–19. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. No scrutiny assessment was conducted for the re...

Rajesh Kumar Malhotra vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-10(1), Delhi & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Reassessment u/s 148 & 148A Quashed Due to Violation of Natural Justice (AY 2018–19)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 165
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner challenged a notice dated 27.03.2022 under Section 148, issued pursuant to an order under Section 148A(d). A show cause notice under Section 148A(b) dated 21.03.2022 alleged b...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs M/s Consortium Nussli Comfort Net (2022) – Section 143(2), 292BB & Jurisdiction Invalid for Non-Issuance of Notice | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 345
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the ITAT order for Assessment Year 2011–12. The assessee had participated in the assessment proceedings without raising objections regarding non-servic...

P.R. Commissioner of Income Tax-12, New Delhi vs Harish Kumar HUF (Delhi High Court) – Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Leviable for Bonafide Error in Dividend Stripping Computation

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 375
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Harish Kumar HUF, filed its return for AY 2015–16 declaring income after adjusting Short Term Capital Loss (STCL) against Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) and claiming exemption under Sec...

Mamta Gupta vs Addl./Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, NFAC Delhi & Ors. – Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Valid on Basis of Fresh Tangible Material (Delhi High Court, 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 156
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner challenged: Notice dated 31 March 2021 issued under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act Reassessment order dated 25 March 2022 The reassessment pertained to A...