ITAT Allahabad Restores Section 68 Addition Matter to CIT(A) Due to Ex-Parte Order: Ankit Gupta vs DCIT (AY 2017-18) | Reliance on CIT v. SAS Educational Society

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, is engaged in the business of two-wheeler dealership and authorized workshop of Honda Motor & Scooter India Ltd. under the name and style of M/s Shree Grand Auto. The ...

Ex-Parte and Non-Speaking Appellate Order Violative of Section 250(6): ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside CIT(A) Order Passed Under Faceless Regime – Ram Lakhan Maurya vs Assessment Unit (AY 2015-16)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 declaring total income of ₹2,41,890. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 147 read with se...

Appeal Dismissed In Limine for Non-Removal of Procedural Defects: ITAT Allahabad Declines to Enter Merits but Grants Liberty for Restoration – Pooja Pal vs ITO (AY 2010-11)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 91
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, for Assessment Year 2010-11 against the appellate order dated 21.03.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Ta...

Non-Speaking Ex-Parte Appellate Order Violates Section 250(6): ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside CIT(A) Order and Restores Matter for De Novo Adjudication – Mohammad Zaki vs ITO (AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 85
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 declaring total income of ₹4,63,420. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under sections 147 read with 1...

Trade Dress Protection in India under the Trade Marks Act, 1999: Evolving Judicial Dimensions, Passing Off Actions & Key Case Laws (ITC v Britannia, Pernod Ricard, Zydus v Cipla, Colgate v Anchor)

Author
Anurag Singhal, Advocate
05/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 357
Read More »
TRADE MARK - Evolving Dimensions of Trade Dress Protection in India-In today’s competitive, visually driven marketplace, consumers identify products by their overall visual identity such as colours, shapes, packagin...

Branding by Sound: A Comparative Study of Sound Trademark Protection in India, EU, and the USA- Statutory Framework in India

Author
Anurag Singhal, Advocate
05/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 255
Read More »
Branding by Sound: A Comparative Study of Sound Trademark Protection in India, EU, and the USA- Statutory Framework in India The Trade Marks Act, 1999 does not explicitly define a sound trademark. However, Sectio...

Final Assessment Order Void Where Mandatory Draft Assessment Order under Section 144C Not Issued Even in Remand Proceedings; Limitation Strictly Enforced: Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. vs. JCIT (Delhi HC

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 263
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Swarovski India Private Limited, filed multiple writ petitions challenging final assessment orders passed for Assessment Years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 pursuant to remand ...

Reassessment Notices Issued Without Proper Sanction under Section 151 Invalid: Delhi High Court Quashes Notices Issued Post Four Years – Sunsat Foods Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. ACIT

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners challenged reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2015-16. The reassessment notices, though dated 31 March 2021, were dig...

Assessment on Non-Existent Amalgamating Entity is Void Ab Initio: Delhi High Court Reaffirms Maruti Suzuki Principle | Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Case

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 241
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present matter formed part of a batch of writ petitions and connected income-tax appeals before the Delhi High Court, including Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., wherein assessment and re...

Final Assessment Without Issuance of Mandatory Draft Assessment Order under Section 144C Is Void Ab Initio – Smart Cube India Pvt. Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 218
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Smart Cube India Private Limited, is an assessee engaged in international transactions and qualified as an “eligible assessee” under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For t...