Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
953,204
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/s Enrich Agro Food Products Pvt. Ltd. | Section 68 Addition on Share Capital & Share Premium – Delhi High Court Judgment (AY 2015-16)

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 177
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order dated 29.04.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning Assessment Year 2015-16. The core issue relates to the addition ma...

Rahul Aggarwal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 70-1 & Anr. – Delhi High Court Sets Aside Reassessment Proceedings Due to Non-Application of Mind under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d) & 148 (AY 2016–17)

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 179
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the notice dated 23.05.2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, along with the subsequent order dated 29.07.2022 passed under Sect...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 vs Steel Authority of India Ltd. – CSR Expenditure Allowability under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 220
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a Public Sector Undertaking, claimed deduction of expenditure incurred towards Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.The Assessing Officer (AO) ...

Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) VI FDI Three Pte. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi (2023) – Reassessment u/s 147 & Validity of TRC under India-Singapore DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 178
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The petitioner, a Singapore-based entity, invested in shares of an Indian company (Agile Electric Sub Assembly Pvt. Ltd.) in 2013. In AY 2016–17, it sold those shares and claimed cap...

Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Invalid Due to Notice on Non-Existent PAN | Sections 147, 148, 144, 271(1)(c), 271F, 272A

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 338
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Swarovski India Private Limited (formerly Swaropearl India Pvt. Ltd.), filed writ petitions challenging reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18. ...

Swarovski India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Proceedings Quashed Due to Invalid PAN Usage & Procedural Lapses under Sections 147 & 148 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 165
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner company was originally incorporated as Swaropearl India Pvt. Ltd. and later renamed as Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. Upon name change, a new PAN was issued, replacing the old ...

Indo Laminates Pvt. Ltd. vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department & Ors. – Delhi High Court Quashes Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice & Section 144B SOP (AY 2021-22)

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 175
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Indo Laminates Private Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2021-22 on 15.03.2022. The case was selected for scrutiny under the Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection...

Swarovski India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Proceedings under Section 148 Quashed Due to PAN Error & Natural Justice Violation

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 173
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Swarovski India Private Limited (formerly Swaropearl India Pvt. Ltd.), challenged reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Years 2015–16, 2016â€...

Ashok Kumar Garg vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Invalid Reassessment Order Under Section 148A(d) for Ignoring Assessee’s Reply

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 199
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged an order dated 30.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) along with a consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. A show cause notice under Secti...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sony Mobile Communications India Pvt Ltd (Now Merged with Sony India Pvt Ltd) – Assessment on Non-Existent Entity Post Amalgamation Invalid u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C | Delhi High Cour

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 177
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case pertains to Assessment Year 2010–11, where the assessee company, originally Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (India) Pvt Ltd, later renamed Sony Mobile Communications (India) Pvt Ltd, w...