Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
954,024
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs KKM Management Centre Pvt. Ltd. – No Disallowance of Secondment Cost & Principle of Consistency Upheld | Delhi High Court (ITA 214/2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 189
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2014–15, wherein the Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which upheld the deletion of an addition of approximately...

Ashok Kumar Madan vs Income Tax Officer Ward 67(1), New Delhi & Anr. – Reassessment Proceedings Set Aside Due to Procedural Lapses under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d) & 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 209
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the validity of: Notice dated 17.03.2023 issued under Section 148A(b) Order dated 31.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) Consequentia...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 vs Veolia India Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | O&M Expenses Not Part of Contract Cost under Percentage Completion Method (AY 2010-11)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 184
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Veolia India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in contracts involving construction and subsequent operation & maintenance (O&M) phases. The assessee followed the percen...

Ardent Info Systems Pvt. Ltd. vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Appeal Considered ‘Pending’ Under Vivad Se Vishwas Act Despite Procedural Defects

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 214
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed its income tax return for AY 2008–09, which was later reassessed under Sections 147/144, determining taxable income. Dissatisfied, the petitioner filed: A physical appeal...

Puneet Kumar Bansal HUF vs Income Tax Officer Ward 28(1), Delhi & Anr. – Delhi High Court Sets Aside Reassessment Order under Sections 148 & 148A(d) Due to Procedural Lapses (AY 2019-20)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 239
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Puneet Kumar Bansal HUF, challenged the order dated 30.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) along with the consequential notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2019-2...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s Financial World (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Binding Nature of CBDT Circulars & Recall of ITAT Orders (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 209
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court challenging the order of the ITAT dated 23.08.2019. The ITAT had dismissed the Revenue’s appeal earlier due to low tax effect, ...

CLH Gaseous Fuel Applications Pvt. Ltd. vs National E-Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Assessment Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice under Section 68 & CBDT Instruction No. 20/2015

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 229
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, CLH Gaseous Fuel Applications Pvt. Ltd., challenged the assessment order dated 22.04.2021 passed under the Faceless Assessment Scheme, 2019 for Assessment Year 2018–19.The Assessing O...

Amtek Transportation Systems Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Stay of Demand & Requirement of Reasoned Order under Sections 144 & 144B of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 188
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Amtek Transportation Systems Limited, challenged an order dated 08.04.2023 whereby its application for stay of a demand notice was rejected without providing cogent reasons. An ex parte...

Mohit Agarwal vs Income Tax Officer & Anr. – Delhi High Court Sets Aside Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice and SOP under Income Tax Proceedings (AY 2018-19)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 206
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mohit Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the assessment order dated 21.03.2023, along with demand notice issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and consequential ...

Mega Selflube Bearings Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 17(1), Delhi (Delhi High Court) – Reassessment Proceedings Quashed Due to Violation of Natural Justice under Sections 148A(d) & 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 171
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year 2016–17, wherein the petitioner challenged the validity of the order dated 31.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a...