Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. – Refund Claim Allowed Due to Time-Barred Assessment under Section 153 (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 66
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd., sought directions for refund of taxes originally paid/adjusted in the case of M/s Flextronics Software Systems Ltd. (FSSL) for Assessment Year 2007...

Shubhank Garg vs Income Tax Officer & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Faceless Assessment Invalid Without Personal Hearing under Section 144B

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged multiple actions of the Income Tax Department, including: Notice issued under Section 133(6) dated 05.12.2022 Proposal under Section 144B dated 13.12.2022 F...

Pradeep Verma vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court) – Reassessment under Sections 148A(b) & 148A(d) set aside for fresh consideration due to incomplete evidence evaluation

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The petitioner filed an income tax return declaring income of Rs. 3,16,540/- for AY 2014-15. The Revenue alleged that the petitioner purchased immovable property worth Rs. ...

Rohit Kapur vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7, New Delhi & Anr. | Section 270AA Immunity Rejection Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice (Delhi High Court 2023:DHC:1970-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rohit Kapur, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 2020–2021 declaring a total income of ₹1,73,72,262. The return was selected for scrutiny under Section 143(3) of the Inc...

Rohit Kapur vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7, New Delhi & Anr. | Section 270AA Immunity Rejection Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice (Delhi High Court 2023:DHC:1970-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 43
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Rohit Kapur, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 2020–2021 declaring a total income of ₹1,73,72,262. The return was selected for scrutiny under Section 143(3) of the...

Rohit Kapur vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7, New Delhi & Anr. | Section 270AA Immunity Rejection Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice (Delhi High Court 2023:DHC:1970-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rohit Kapur, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 2020–2021 declaring a total income of ₹1,73,72,262. The return was selected for scrutiny under Section 143(3) of the Inc...

Milestone Systems A/S vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Section 197, 195 & Royalty on Software Payments | 2023:DHC:1926-DB

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a non-resident company incorporated in Denmark, is engaged in providing IP video management software and surveillance-related products globally. It entered into Distributor Partne...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Delhi vs Springer India Pvt. Ltd. (2023) – Delhi High Court | APA Applicability in Transfer Pricing for Pre-APA Years

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning AY 2012–13. The Tribunal had passed the impugned order pursuant to remand directions issu...

World Wide Metals Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer Ward 27(1), Delhi & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Section 148 & 148A – Minimum 7 Days Mandatory Response Time

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the validity of: Notice issued under Section 148A(b) dated 22.03.2022 Order passed under Section 148A(d) Reassessment proceedings initiated under...

Lotus Law Partners LLP (Through Legal Heir) vs Income Tax Officer Ward 54(4) Delhi | Delhi High Court | Section 148A & 148 Income Tax Act – Reassessment on Dissolved Entity Invalid

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the notice dated 14.03.2022 issued under Section 148A(b), the order dated 31.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d), and the consequential notice issued un...