Mansi Aggarwal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 62(1) Delhi & Anr. – Reassessment Proceedings Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Reply under Section 148A(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year 2015–16, wherein the petitioner challenged the order dated 24.11.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. A notice under Se...

Draken Metals Trading Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1), Delhi & Anr. – Challenge to Reassessment Proceedings under Sections 148, 148A(b) & 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 56
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Draken Metals Trading Private Limited, filed the present writ petition challenging: Order dated 26.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Conse...

Modi Industries Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. | Delhi High Court | Reassessment u/s 148 Beyond 4 Years Quashed (2023:DHC:2501-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner had undergone scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3), completed on 29.12.2016. A reassessment notice dated 31.03.2021 was issued for AY 2014–15 under Sect...

Modi Industries Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court) – Reassessment Quashed on Ground of Change of Opinion under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 64
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Modi Industries Limited, filed its return of income which was scrutinized under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. During the original assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (...

Majestic Handicraft Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment under Section 148A Quashed for Lack of Due Diligence

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 59
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a company engaged in export of readymade garments, was issued a notice under Section 148A(b) alleging that it had received accommodation entries from two entities—Balaji Enterprises a...

Kamal Nath vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Challenge to Section 153C Notice | Reassessment & Natural Justice

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 56
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kamal Nath, challenged notices issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act for multiple assessment years ranging from AY 2010–11 to AY 2020–21. The reassessment proceedings were...

Shukla Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22(2), Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court) – Reassessment Proceedings Quashed for Non-Supply of Material under Sections 148A & 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 49
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Shukla Enterprises Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging: Order dated 29.07.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) Notice dated 30.07.2022 issued under Sec...

Dhruv Lamba vs Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) & Anr. | Delhi High Court on Black Money Act – Validity of Section 10 Notice, Limitation & Retrospective Applicability

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged: Notice dated 08.04.2022 issued under Section 10(1) of the Black Money Act Order dated 10.11.2022 rejecting application for dropping proceedings Show ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. – Section 47(iv) Exemption on Transfer of Capital Asset to Wholly Owned Subsidiary | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 61
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe respondent/assessee, M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd., transferred “Trunk Infrastructure” (including roads and related infrastructure), which constituted capital work-in-progr...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs KKM Management Centre Pvt. Ltd. | Allowability of Secondment Expenses u/s 37(1) & Scope of Section 260A – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The assessee entered into a Secondment Agreement dated 30.05.2011 with Godfrey Philips India Ltd. (GPI). Payments of ₹14.33 crore were made to GPI on a cost-to-company basis ...