Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow) Quashes Section 73 GST Order Against M/s Gomdhari Where Hearing Notice Was Buried Under 'Additional Notices' Tab, Following Ola Fleet Technologies (Writ Tax No. 1342 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Gomdhari, through its proprietor Mukesh Kumar Srivastava, challenged an order dated 28.02.2024 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 and the appellate order dated 22.05.2025 dismissing its f...
Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Section 73(9) Order Against Varasiddivinayaka Stone Crusher on Cost, Grants One More Opportunity to Reply; Jurisdictional Cross-Empowerment Plea Kept Open (WP No. 36614 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Shri Kalyanam Jayadeep, proprietor of M/s Varasiddivinayaka Stone Crusher (GSTIN 29ASDPJ5430A1Z6), challenged a chain of proceedings issued by State GST authorities: a pre-intimation notice dated 12.11...
Allahabad High Court Quashes Section 73 GST Demand Against M/s Nova Enterprises Over Mismatched Personal Hearing Date in Show-Cause Notice; Orders Fresh Hearing (Writ Tax No. 971 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Nova Enterprises, through its proprietor Sushila Jaiswal, challenged an assessment order dated 16.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act, 2017, as well as the subsequent appellate order dat...
Allahabad High Court Quashes Section 73 GST Order for Uploading Notice Under 'Additional Notices and Orders' Tab, Following Ola Fleet Technologies Precedent — M/s Sona Auto Mobiles vs State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 4011 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Sona Auto Mobiles challenged an order dated April 18, 2024 passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, UPGST, Sector 20, Varanasi under Section 73 of the GST Act, 2017, creating a demand against the peti...
Delhi High Court Remands GST Order Passed Under Disputed Notification 56/2023 After SCN Uploaded Only on 'Additional Notices' Tab, Grants Fresh Reply Opportunity — Bharat Steel Traders vs Commissioner of Delhi GST (W.P.(C) 10196/2025)
Facts of the Case
Bharat Steel Traders, through its proprietor, challenged a show cause notice dated 21st May, 2024 and the consequent order dated 9th August, 2024 for financial year 2019-20, along with Notification No....
Madurai Bench Permits Belated GST Appeal Without Limitation Bar or 10% Pre-Deposit Since Entire Disputed Tax Already Paid — Karthick Loganathan vs Commercial Tax Officer (W.P(MD)No.24605 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Karthick Loganathan (GSTIN 33HWJPK1239M1Z7) challenged an order under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 dated 27.02.2025 (Ref. No. ZD330225286384C) and the consequential Form GST DRC-07 summary of orde...
Madurai Bench Quashes GST Appeal Rejection for Marginal Delay, Directs Numbering and Disposal on Merits — Tvl Sri Valliamman Enterprises vs Deputy State Tax Officer 1 (WP(MD) NO. 29766 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Tvl Sri Valliamman Enterprises (GSTIN 33ATNPR2628B1ZT) filed an appeal against an assessment order dated 29.06.2024 for the assessment year 2019-20. The appellate authority, by proceedings dated 20.03....
Delhi High Court Remands GST Order Passed on Notification 56/2023 Extended Timeline, Grants Fresh Reply Opportunity Subject to Cost, Keeping Notification Validity Open — Kamal Rajput (M/s Perfect Gear Industries) vs Union of India (W.P.(C) 17781/2025)
Facts of the Case
Kamal Rajput, proprietor of M/s Perfect Gear Industries, challenged an order dated 20th August, 2024 passed by the Sales Tax Officer for the tax period April 2019 to March 2020, along with a show cause...
Orissa High Court Condones Delay in Filing GST Registration Revocation Application Under Rule 23, Directs Portal to Be Opened on Compliance With Dues — Mohammed Abdul Razzak vs State Tax Officer, Ganjam-II Circle (WP(C) No. 22984 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Mohammed Abdul Razzak's GST registration, under the jurisdiction of the State Tax Officer, Ganjam-II Circle, had been cancelled, apparently for continuous default in furnishing returns. He approached t...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Allows Challenge to DIN-Less Section 73 Order Even After Appeal Rejected on Limitation, Holding Original Order Remains Assailable — M/s Sree Vishwaksen Constructions vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (WRIT PETITION NO. 15118 OF 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Sree Vishwaksen Constructions, a partnership firm engaged in construction, challenged an ex-parte order under Section 73 of the APGST Act, 2017 dated 16.08.2024 for the tax period April 2019 to Mar...