Facts of the CaseM/S Arohi Enterprises, a GST-registered dealer engaged in the business of tobacco leaves, challenged a summary order issued under Form GST DRC-07 dated 02.07.2023 and a penalty order dated the same day u...
Facts of the CaseGeorge Joseph Kanjamala, owner of a commercial building ('KM Tower') at Alakode, Kannur, was assessed to Service Tax arrears (under the pre-GST 'Renting of Immovable Property' taxable category, Finance A...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Anil Kumar Malik, through his proprietorship M/s Anil Kumar Contractor, provided road and drainage construction services to Government and Local Authorities during financial year 2016-17 ...
Facts of the CaseThe applicant, Mukeem, had earlier been granted bail in a case registered as FIR/Case Crime No.23 of 2009, GST (Sessions Trial) No.204 of 2010, under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Ac...
Facts of the CaseM/S Sneha Agency and Varieties challenged an adjudication order dated 01.06.2022 passed under Section 73 of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Act (confirming a demand the petitioner claimed it had...
Facts of the CaseGemar Lollen and M/s M. L. Enterprise, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, challenged a notice dated 12.09.2022 issued by the Superintendent of Tax, Excise & Narcotics, West Siang District, Aalo, dir...
Facts of the CaseM/s Bundi Silica Sand Supply Company had been purchasing High Speed Diesel against Form 'C' under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, for its mining-related manufacturing activities. After the amendment to ...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, an Inspector of Central Tax at the Hyderabad-II Audit Commissionerate, had challenged an order dated 30.01.2023 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench (in OA No. 63 of 20...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sambasiva Rao Thokala, a proprietorship registered with the Tenali GST Range under the Guntur CGST Commissionerate, had his GST registration first suspended (order dated 14.01.2023) and t...
Facts of the CasePrasanna Kumar Mohanty challenged a demand raised against him based on payments received in the GST regime for works that had actually been executed in the earlier VAT regime, contending that the Commiss...