Facts of the Case
MRF Limited, represented through its authorised signatory, challenged a show cause notice
dated 15.02.2021 proposing to disallow input tax credit under
Section 16(4) of the BGST Act read with Rule 36...
Facts of the Case
Tvl.Ashok Trading Company, represented by its partner Mahendra N Patel, filed two writ
petitions before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seek...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Sonotone Audio LLP, Mumbai, represented by its Director, filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P4, a show cause notice dated 12.9.2021 issued under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act in ...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Rocky Jaiswal, moved the High Court at Calcutta in its Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction, aggrieved by the respondent State GST authority's action of blocking his Electronic Credit Ledge...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Sri Durga Bhavani Enterprises, a partnership firm represented by its partner, approached the High Court for the State of Telangana under Article 226 of the Constitution against the Stat...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s Raghav Metals, engaged in the business of copper wires and copper scraps and registered under the Delhi GST Act, 2017 and the Central GST Act, 2017, sold copper scrap to M/s R.N.T. ...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Santa Prasad Shaw alias Santa Prasad Jaiswal, approached the High Court at Calcutta under its Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) aggrieved by the action of the respondent...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner in W.P.No.6404 of 2022, before the Telangana High Court, was aggrieved by its inability to file Form GST TRAN-1 to carry forward transitional input tax credit into the GST regime. When t...
Facts of the Case
Petitioner, M/s Span Constructions, a works contractor, had carried out contract work for the 3rd respondent (Superintending Engineer, PWD Buildings) and completed the same on 26.03.2018. GST came to b...
Facts of the Case
Petitioner Mohammed Shahzada was aggrieved by the action of the respondent State GST authority in blocking his Electronic Credit Ledger, and further by the authority's failure to complete the underlyin...