Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. N K Media Ventures Private Limited, Khorda, approached the Orissa High Court under Article 226 in connection with the cancellation of its GST registration. The matter was taken up ...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/S Jai Vindhya Udyog, through its partner Niraj Kumar Agarwal, challenged an order dated 02.09.2023 dismissing its appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act as time-barred, and the under...
Facts of the Case
The petitioners, M/s Pradhan Tyres, Bharosa Developers and Pragati Transport, all of Sundargarh, filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court against the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Tax...
Facts of the Case
The petitioners, H.S.J. Enterprise & Anr., filed a writ petition against the State of West Bengal, represented by its Secretary, Finance Department, and others, seeking a direction upon the respondent ...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Shri Krishana Ravi, a contractor aged 58 from Bagalkot District, Karnataka, holding GSTIN 29AFCPR0045K1ZC, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking t...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Sri Narasima Nayaka, a contractor from Koppal District, Karnataka, holding GSTIN 29AESPN3796A1ZZ, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging Annexu...
Facts of the Case
The applicant — cause-titled as Shri Bhavesh Kumar Sahni, though the body of the order names the applicant seeking bail as "Raman Kantpal," while the underlying criminal complaint names Bhavik Sahani...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Shastha Enterprises, Kollam, represented by its Managing Partner N. Nandakumar, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the J...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/S Kumar Brothers, a proprietorship firm registered under the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act (GSTIN 18AEKPM5808E1ZE), sold goods to M/s Shlok Brothers, Delhi, under e-way bill no. 88...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner in this matter (named neither in the order nor in the caption beyond the case number) challenged an order dated 07.03.2022 cancelling the petitioner's GST registration for non-filing of ...