Facts of the CaseBSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. and another, electricity distribution utilities functioning as DISCOMs in Delhi, filed the present writ petition challenging paragraph 4(1) of Circular No.34/8/2018-GST dated 01....
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, a registered taxpayer holding GSTIN 37A1AP15009B1ZW, was issued a show-cause notice dated 26.06.2023 by the fourth respondent proposing cancellation of GST registration. By order dated ...
Facts of the CaseShastha Enterprises, a registered dealer under the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, represented by its managing partner, was subjected to a vehicle interception by the Assistant State Tax Officer, Surveillance Squad...
Facts of the CaseVasudeva Adigas Fast Food Private Limited, a company registered under the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (KGST Act), filed two connected writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at B...
Facts of the CaseBasudev Mittal, proprietor of M/s Shree Sainath Enterprises, Raipur, was arrested on 30.03.2022 in connection with Crime No.178/GST/2021-22 registered at the Office of the Principal Commissioner, Central...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/S A.P. Iron Traders, filed this writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 174(2) of the Punjab Goods and Service Tax Ac...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Suraj Kumar Pattanaik and SN Construction, Sambalpur, had approached the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack by way of a writ petition against the Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, and another...
Facts of the CaseM/s Dholagiri Enterprises (GSTIN 06DMLPK8324R1Z8) was subjected to search operations on 08.01.2021 by teams of CGST, Panchkula under Section 67 of the CGST Act, 2017, followed by an inquiry under Section...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Badha Ram, a wholesale distributor of mobile accessories and electronic items falling under HSN code 8517 (taxable at 18% GST), with business premises at Kottayam and Trivandrum, was th...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged an order dated 27.06.2023 passed by the first respondent, an officer of the Commercial Tax Department administering GST, on the ground that the impugned proceedings had not been...