Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. Hamilton Residency Pvt Ltd, operates a bar-attached hotel under an FL-3 licence and is registered under the Kerala GST regime. An assessment order dated 24.08.2023 determined tax, ...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a proprietorship concern registered under GST (GSTIN 29APEPA0844H1Z6), was issued a show-cause notice dated 09.11.2022 proposing cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns for...
Facts of the CaseAn adjudication order was passed against the petitioner, M/S Ankit Motors, on 27.10.2021. The petitioner filed a first appeal against that order under Section 107 of the GST Act on 30.06.2022. The Appell...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Amit Kaushik, sought regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.405 dated 24.10.2020, registered at Police Station Faridabad Central under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC (Sect...
Facts of the CaseNutan Warehousing Company Pvt. Ltd., licensed as a warehouseman under the Bombay Warehouses Act, 1959 and registered under the CGST/MGST Act, let out its Fursungi (Pune) warehouse to Unilever India Expor...
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, a Class-A electrical contractor registered with the Kerala Public Works Department, was awarded a contract in 2019 for augmenting the power system at Government Medical College, Kozhikode,...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. Institute of Baking and Cake Art (GSTIN 29ADWPG995P9ZZ), a proprietorship represented by Sri Manish Gaur, challenged an order dated 06.10.2023 passed by the Additional Commissioner...
Facts of the CaseM/S Makewell Pharma, a proprietorship concern engaged in civil contractual work and registered under the GST Act, had its registration cancelled by order dated 23.12.2022 passed by the Superintendent, Se...
Facts of the CaseStar Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer and supplier of electronic components regularly supplying to Bajaj Auto Limited (BAL) under a Bill-to-Ship-to arrangement, inadvertently mentioned the GSTIN o...
Facts of the CaseThis batch of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, led by Bharat Udyog Ltd. and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 26(6A), (6B) and (6C) of the Mahara...