Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
M/s Golden Globe Infra Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner ST, Ananthapuramu-II Circle & Anr. – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Composite GST Assessment Order Covering Multiple Financial Years; Separate Assessment Required Under Sections 73 & 74 of the CGST/APGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Golden Globe Infra Private Limited,
a registered taxpayer under the GST law, challenged an Assessment Order
dated 04.02.2026 (DIN3704022668299) passed by the Assistant Commissioner,...
Vaitlas Infra vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order Without DIN and Remands Matter Subject to 20% Deposit | Sections 73, 169 & 168A of the CGST/APGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Vaitlas Infra, challenged the
assessment order dated 26.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the GST
Act for the Financial Year 2018-19. The petitioner primarily
contended that the asses...
Srinivasa Rao Uggini vs Superintendent of Central Tax & Union of India – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order Passed Without Mandatory DRC-01A Intimation Under Rule 142(1A) of the CGST Rules, 2017 | W.P. No. 6453 of 2026
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Srinivasa Rao Uggini, challenged the Order-in-Original
No. VSP-GST-SUPDT-14/24-25(MNM) dated 17.02.2025, relating to the Financial
Year 2020-21, passed by the Superintendent of Central ...
Narayana Sakamuri vs Deputy Assistant Commissioner & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Unsigned GST Assessment Order and Remands Matter Subject to 20% Deposit | Sections 74, 50, 160 & 169 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged an assessment order dated 03.06.2025
passed under Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, whereby the
department raised:
Tax
Demand: ₹24,10,590
Interest
Dema...
M/s Sai Sujatha Engineering Works vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Ibrahimpatnam Circle & Anr. – Andhra Pradesh High Court | Assessment Order Without DIN Quashed | Sections 169, 73, GST Act, 2017 | Principles of Natural Justice
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Sai Sujatha Engineering Works,
challenged the Assessment Order issued in FORM GST DRC-07 dated 17.08.2024
for the tax period 2019-20, along with the consequential demand notice
dat...
M/s Sri Krishna Agencies vs Deputy Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order for Absence of DIN; Reassessment Directed Subject to 20% Deposit | Section 73 & Section 169 of CGST/APGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Sri Krishna Agencies, challenged
the assessment order dated 30.04.2024, the appellate endorsement dated 22.07.2025,
the summary in Form GST DRC-07, and the show cause notice issued ...
Sai Sujatha Engineering Works vs. Assistant Commissioner, Ibrahimpatnam Circle & State of Andhra Pradesh – Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order Issued Without DIN; Remands Matter Subject to 20% Deposit under Section 169 of the CGST/APGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sai Sujatha Engineering Works,
challenged the GST Assessment Order issued in Form GST DRC-07 dated
17.08.2024 for the tax period 2020-21, along with the consequential
Demand Notice dat...
Meganatha Naidu Vadlamudi vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax & Others: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Composite GST Assessment Order Covering Multiple Financial Years – Sections 73 & 74 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mr. Meganatha Naidu Vadlamudi, a
registered taxpayer under the GST law, challenged Order-in-Original No.
08/2025-GST-Adjn (AC) dated 03.12.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner
of ...
Toshikaa Rejora & Others vs State (NCT of Delhi) & Another | Saurabh Chadha vs State (NCT of Delhi) & Another – Delhi High Court Quashes Cross FIRs After Mediation Settlement Between Former Partners | Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 120B, 379 & 380 IPC
Facts of the CaseThe petitions were filed before the Delhi High Court seeking
quashing of two cross FIRs arising out of disputes between the erstwhile
partners of M/s Likes, a partnership firm operating a salon busines...
The State of Telangana, Land Acquisition Officer (RDO), Narsampet vs Gundam Ranga Rao & Others – Telangana High Court Upholds Compensation at ₹375 per Sq. Yard for Land Acquired for Cattle Market; Sections 4(1), 6, 18 & 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Facts of the CaseThe Government acquired wet agricultural land measuring Ac.4.25
guntas situated in Survey Nos. 55, 56 and 776 at Narsampet Village and
Mandal, Warangal District, for establishing a cattle market. The
...