Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,526,474
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Karnataka High Court Quashes 'Laconic and Cryptic' Appellate Order Rejecting IGST Refund Claim, Remits for Fresh Consideration — Virtusa Consulting Services vs Union of India (WP No. 25763 of 2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S Virtusa Consulting Services Private Limited (GSTIN 29AACCV6797L2ZB), challenged an Order-in-Appeal dated 22.02.2023 passed under Section 107(11) of the KGST/CGST Act, 2017, which ha...

Orissa High Court Directs GST Appeal Before Now-Functional GSTAT Within Staggered Filing Window Under September 2025 Notification, Subject to Section 112(8) Deposit — M/s. P A Project Pvt. Limited vs Principal Commissioner of CGST (W.P.(C) No. 29526 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/s. P A Project Pvt. Limited challenged an order dated 27.10.2023 passed under Section 73 of the CGST/OGST Act for the tax periods July 2017 to March 2018, which had been affirmed in appeal on 15.09.2...

Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Section 74 Order and Appeal Dismissal Over ITC From a Deregistered Supplier, Directs Fresh Adjudication on the Petitioner's Section 73(5) Voluntary Payment — Dharmendra Singh vs Deputy Commissioner of Revenue, Bally & Salkia Charge (WPA 3965 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Dharmendra Singh, a registered taxpayer, had availed and utilised Input Tax Credit in respect of transactions with one Balaji Trading Co. between June and November 2019. After Balaji Tr...

Madras High Court Criticises Officers for Not Exploring Alternate Modes of Service Under Section 169 Before Passing Ex Parte GST Orders on Unread Portal Notices — M/s. Hi Tech Foams vs State Tax Officer, Madurai (W.P.(MD) No. 112 of 2026)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/s. Hi Tech Foams challenged an assessment order dated 27.08.2024 (GSTIN 33AAHFH3859D1ZI, tax period 2019-20), passed after the show cause notice and three reminders were all uploaded solely on the GS...

Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court Directs Restoration of GST Number Within Seven Days Subject to Filing Returns and Paying Dues, Applies Sheikh Mohammad Yousuf Ruling — Zahoor Habib vs Union Territory of J&K (WP(C) No. 1712/2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Zahoor Habib, approached the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh seeking restoration of his cancelled GST registration number. Counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on a j...

Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) Quashes Overlapping GST Orders for Same Tax Period Passed in DRC-05 and DRC-07, Remits for Fresh Adjudication on Merits — Crown Metal Scraps vs The Deputy State Tax Officer-2, Karur (W.P.(MD) No. 16183 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the Case Crown Metal Scraps challenged an order dated 27.08.2024 passed for the tax period 2019-20 (GSTIN 33AANFC9639A1ZH), along with the consequential recovery order dated 20.02.2025 in FORM GST DRC-13 under ...

Karnataka High Court (Kalaburagi Bench) Condones 290-Day Delay in Filing GST Appeal on Parity With Coordinate Bench Rulings, Remits for Adjudication on Merits — Prudential Properties vs Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals) (WP No. 202518 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S Prudential Properties, a GST-registered partnership firm, was issued a show cause notice dated 22.12.2023 for FY 2018-19 proposing a demand of GST on electricity, HVAC, and DG charg...

Punjab and Haryana High Court Holds Retired Partner Remains Liable for Firm's GST Dues Absent Written Intimation of Retirement to the Commissioner Under Section 90 CGST Act — Harvinder Singh vs State of Punjab and Others (CWP-9172-2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the Case Harvinder Singh sought quashing of a summoning order dated 20.02.2025 issued by the Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assistant Collector, calling upon him and other partners of M/s Foreigners Auto Zone ...

Karnataka High Court Quashes Section 50 Interest Demand on Tax Already Paid Through Electronic Cash and Credit Ledgers, Follows Bangalore International Airport Ruling — Eureka Forbes Limited vs Union of India (WP No. 6869 of 2020)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/S Eureka Forbes Limited, challenged a notice dated 07.02.2020 (Order No. 04/DRC07/SD3) and consequent recovery in Form GST DRC-07, demanding Rs. 42,68,333/- towards interest on delaye...

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 74 CGST Order Passed Without Notice, Restores Registration, Orders Refund of Penalty Component Only Since Business Was Discontinued — Applicate IT Solutions Pvt Ltd (WP No. 16970 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
12/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the Case Applicate IT Solutions Pvt Ltd challenged an order bearing No. 21/2024-25 dated 30.04.2024 passed under Section 74 of the CGST Act by the Superintendent of Central Excise and Central Tax, contending it...