Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,622,135
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Regular Bail Granted in a Rs.48.92 Crore Fake Invoicing and Input Tax Credit Case Since the Trial Will Take Time and the Evidence Is Purely Documentary: Punjab and Haryana High Court in Dipanshu Anand vs Principal Commissioner, Central GST, Ludhiana (CRM-M-44890-2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 62
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDipanshu Anand, associated with M/s Gauri Shankar Metal Industries (a partnership) and M/s Shivansh Enterprises (a sole proprietorship), was arrested on 03.07.2025 in connection with a complaint under Se...

Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Section 130 CGST Confiscation of Lithium Battery Consignment, Holds Jurisdictional Facts for Seizure Were Absent as Invoice and E-Way Bill Disclosed the Full Transaction Chain -- Redon Lithium Industries LLP vs Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Writ Petition No. 29645/2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioners were, respectively, the consignor (Redon Lithium Industries LLP, Bengaluru), the buyer (M/s. ADMS Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Belgaum) and the consignee (M/s. K R Foods, Kukatpally, Hyderaba...

Non-Functional GST Appellate Tribunal Does Not Justify Writ Interference: Chhattisgarh High Court Directs the Assessee to Pursue the Section 112 Appellate Remedy With Interim Pre-Deposit Protection in Abhay Parakh vs Commissioner of State Tax, Chhattisgarh (WPT No. 176 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAbhay Parakh, proprietor of Madhu Traders, had filed all statutory GST returns (GSTR-1, 3B, 9 and 9C) for FY 2017-18. A scrutiny notice (Form SMT-10) dated 24.05.2023 could not be replied to due to porta...

Madras High Court Grants Appeal Without Pre-Deposit Against GST Levied on Mining Royalty and Seigniorage Charges, Pending Supreme Court's Udaipur Chambers Ruling — Nagem Cori vs Deputy State Tax Officer-1, Tenkasi (WP(MD) No. 29295 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the Case: Nagem Cori, represented by its proprietor Aliar Urawther Ibrahim Kunju, challenged a Show Cause Notice dated 09.12.2024 and the consequent assessment order dated 12.06.2025 for FY 2021-22, whereby GST ...

Assessment Order Fails to Adjust Tax Already Recovered From the Assessee: Madras High Court Quashes and Remands the Section 73(9) Demand, Treating It as an Addendum to the Original SCN, in Tvl. Punithan Stores vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Madurai (W.P(MD)No.23286 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the CaseTvl. Punithan Stores was assessed under Section 73(9) read with Rule 142(5) for tax period 2021-22 via an order dated 28.06.2025, preceded by a show cause notice in DRC-01 dated 18.04.2025. The impugned ...

Madras High Court Grants Temporary Reprieve to Assessee Who Missed Personal Hearing Due to Accountant's Lapse, Conditions Fresh Consideration on 25% Pre-Deposit — Sri Karuppasamy Traders vs Deputy State Tax Officer (WP(MD) No. 23325 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the Case: M/s. Sri Karuppasamy Traders, represented by its proprietor V. Ayyappan, challenged an assessment order dated 27.01.2025 for the assessment year 2020-21, passed following a Show Cause Notice in Form GS...

Denial of GST Portal Access Preventing Appeal Filing Remedied: Calcutta High Court Extends Limitation for Section 73 Appeal and Directs Fresh Response to Pending Show Cause Notice in Aparajita Mukherjee vs Union of India (WPA 24091 of 2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the Case Aparajita Mukherjee's access to the GST portal had been denied, preventing her from filing statutory responses or an appeal. Following an earlier order dated 30th July 2025, the CGST authorities (respo...

Karnataka High Court Quashes Ex Parte GST Adjudication Order Passed on Undelivered Show Cause Notices, Remits With Cost of Rs 5,000 — M/S Padma Fertilizers vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (WP No. 26162 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 56
Read More »
Facts of the Case: M/S Padma Fertilizers, a proprietary concern engaged in the business of fertilizers and chemicals and regularly discharging its tax liability, challenged an adjudication order dated 07.02.2025 and the ...

Section 74 Order Passed Without Considering Assessee's Reply or Granting Hearing Under Section 75(4) Set Aside: Karnataka High Court Remits Matter in M/S KMC Constructions Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax (Writ Petition No. 33827 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 53
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/S KMC Constructions Ltd, for tax period 2017-18, was issued an intimation notice and thereafter a show-cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 under Section 74 of the CGST/KGST Act, 2017 dated 13.10.2023, ca...

Tax Reversed 'Under Protest' Can Never Be Treated as an Admitted Liability: Himachal Pradesh High Court Quashes a Section 74 Interest and Penalty Order Over Suspected Input Tax Credit in Shyama Power India Ltd. vs State of H.P. (CWP No. 6990 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 77
Read More »
Facts of the CaseShyama Power India Ltd. (GSTIN 02AAHCS6024L1ZE), engaged in constructing transmission lines for hydro-electric projects, was audited under Section 65 of the HPGST/CGST Acts for 2017-18 and 2018-19. The a...